From: toon@toon.com   
      
   On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:56:29 +1100, Sky Rider    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 4 Jul 2003 19:24:44 -0700, aikorn@aikorn.com (Úlmøså ß.   
   >Åçthë¤lôñû§) wrote:   
   >   
   >>I wonder... If Fudge needed more proof that Voldemort had returned   
   >>than just taking Harry's word for it, why didn't Dumbledore take   
   >>Harry's memory of the event (which would have been a kindness to   
   >>Harry) and put it in a Pensieve for Fudge to see the event for   
   >>himself?   
   >   
   >Another good question... tho I suppose it would kill the book if he   
   >did that?? :)   
      
   Fudge would claim it was altered?  Or the kid's insane so why believe   
   him?  Maybe you can't take another's memory, and Harry was too   
   inexperienced to do it himself?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)