From: toon@toon.com   
      
   On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:36:51 +0100, Robert Haas   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 16.11.2010 17:11, Toon wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:22:37 -0800 (PST), Wendy Miles   
   >>   wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I want to know why they made the last movie a two parter and so far   
   >>>from each other. Call me not a happy camper   
   >>   
   >> WB likes money.  HP = money.  No HP= no money.  More HP = more money.   
   >> An extra film = more money.  Logic dictates listening to fans support   
   >> of multi part movies and splitting DH into 2 films = more money.   
   >   
   >I'm quite sure money played a big role in this decision, but I still   
   >think think it was a good one, even if for the false reasons...   
   >HP7 really does have a whole lot of a plot, I think putting it all in 2   
   >1/2 hours would have ruined quite much.   
      
   It's great we benefit from 2 movies, but don't think they sat around   
   debating how to best adapt it.  They wanted more money, and found a   
   perfect way tog et it, since fans have been saying we might need   
   multipart movies since OOP.  If it's not well received, they still get   
   money, and blame the fans for their dumb idea. It's win-win-win.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)