Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,056 of 130,933    |
|    Hootie Hoot Owl to Draco Malfoy    |
|    Re: Deathly Hallows...Legends and Wands?    |
|    30 Nov 10 15:44:59    |
      From: hootiehootowl@aol.com              On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:44:13 -0500, Draco Malfoy wrote:              > The Deathly Hallows all fall short of their "proper" titles.       >       > The Cloak of Invisibility fails to hide the user from death.       >       > The Resurrection Stone does not truly bring people back from the dead       > but rather, projects a departed image of them, almost like Cedric       > appearing out of Voldemort's wand in Goblet of Fire.       >       > In the same way then, that the Elder Wand is not an unbeatable       > wand--an extremely powerful one yes, but as shown in Half Blood       > Prince, can be disarmed like any other.       >       > Grindelwald and Dumbledore were on the same level of skill. As Jo       > says, he was almost like his "Dark Twin", with the same       > capabilities. Dumbledore admits though that he did have a shade       > better then him in skill but this is mostly down to his kind       > arrogance, and we can forgive him LOL because he's..well, Dumbledore.       >       > In my opinion, I think Dumbledore beat him and won the wand, out of a       > mixture of good fortune and prestigious skill. If the places were       > exchanged, and a similar thing happened--then it may have been       > possible for Grindelwald to achieve the exact same results.              Like others have said (and like Dumbledore himself said), the legends       that crop up around the hallows are simply that: legends.              The Elder Wand was very powerful, perhaps even the most powerful wand       ever made. And, over generations of retelling of stories that could       come up as a unbeatable wand. But put that wand in the hand of a 1st       or 2nd year up against any full grown, fully qualified wizard, and the       one with the Elder Wand would not stand a chance.              So, Dumbledore was probably a more powerful wizard that Grindelwald       and he probably had a very good wand that he'd had all his life so it       probably worked very well for him.       --       I am running for President - http://www.partyoflogic.com/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca