Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,061 of 130,933    |
|    Draco Malfoy to All    |
|    Re: A question about the Elder Wand    |
|    30 Nov 10 16:02:45    |
      From: isleofcapri@gmail.com              On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:02:12 -0500, \--><\(\(\(\(\(@> wrote:              > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC), Alexander Cain wrote:       >       >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:06:37 -0500, Vinnie Yasay wrote:       >>       >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:21:20 -0800 (PST), Rats wrote:       >>>       >>>> The Elder wand is supposed to be a wand that cannot lose in duels yet       >>>> Dumbledore beat Grindewald in a duel to win the elder wand off him.       >>>> How could this be?       >>>       >>> I think Dumbledore used an emotional appeal. He cared about       >>> Grindelwald and wouldn't have wanted to duel him, particularly if he       >>> knew Grindelwald had the Elder Wand. And he knew that Grindelwald felt       >>> as guilty as he did about Ariana's death. Rita Skeeter said that based       >>> on eyewitness accounts of their confrontation, it seemed to be more of       >>> a surrender on Grindelwald's end than a duel. I know that taking Rita       >>> Skeeter at her word is risky, but I'm willing to believe Dumbledore       >>> won this one with only his words.       >>       >> I really beleive a huge amount more to Rita than Albus. Even if that       >> amount is infinitesimal. tongue.gif       >>       >> What is a wand but a magic channeler for the wizard/witch's       >> spellcasting?       >>       >> Wandless magic is well-known. So there are wizards/witches who are       >> powerful enough to channel magic withoud a prop.       >>       >> Is wandless magic more powerful than wand magic? I guess so, it's (at       >> least) faster. In a duel reflexes can be decisive. So our "unbeatable"       >> wand can be defeated by wandless magic.       >       > I think spontaneous child magic is quite different than adult wandless       > trained magic.              Do you have any examples of "adult wandless trained magic" from the       books? I can't think of any. The closest thing to that I can remember       is Harry causing his wand tip to illuminate with his hand a few inches       from his wand. Not exactly what I would call powerful magic.       --       The fans rightly adore me !       https://twitter.com/TomFelton              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca