Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,238 of 130,933    |
|    Jeffrey Goldberg to All    |
|    Re: Is Parseltongue Cryptography...?    |
|    13 Feb 11 22:46:38    |
      XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt       From: nobody@goldmark.org              Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier (and thanks for the later nudge).              On 11-02-11 4:48 PM, VD wrote:              > In this context, PT _might_ meet the criteria of an asymmetric       > transmission. PT would be the public "key" or sounds everyone could       > hear or see (hidden in meaning), the private "key" is the ability to       > translate. Only the select have that key, it is self-generated and       > exists within the select only.              Harry may not have known that he was speaking Parseltongue, but he       certainly understood what he said and heard in it. So I don't see the       asymmetry you describe. Harry, at times, didn't know that he was       speaking a "secret language" (think of the duel in Chamber of Secrets,       when he thought that everyone heard him trying to stop the snake). But I       don't see how this is analogous to public key encryption.              > Isn't this similar to a PGP/GnuPGP encrypted email for instance? With       > the only difference being the keys are used by intelligent programs       > instead of the intelligence of the individual?              As I said, just because Harry wasn't conscious of his knowledge or use       of Parseltongue, he still understand what he was saying and hearing. So       again, I'm afraid that as cool as I think Parseltongue is, with respect       to the question of cryptography it is no difference than an ordinary       (though obscure) human language.              I jumped into this thread hoping to come to a different conclusion. But       from code talkers to shibboleths, we've seen ordinary language used in       the same was a Parseltongue.              Cheers,              -j              --       Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/       I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts       Reply-To address is valid              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca