Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,483 of 130,933    |
|    VD to Deevo    |
|    Re: Just watched the DH movie    |
|    01 May 11 08:52:22    |
      From: DON'Tvictordix@imapmail.orgSPAMME              On Sun, 1 May 2011 14:55:52 +0800, Deevo wrote:              > And overall I was pleasantly surprised bu the film adaptation.              Glad to hear. ;)              > I skipped this one at the cinema mainly because I felt that in breaking the       > seventh book into two parts, WB would be making this a cash generating       > action fest rather than telling the story of the book.              Considering your historical stance on these matters, did you not see       the previous movies?              > There was some pretty intense action in the film but not so over the       > top as to diminish the story telling even though there were a       > coouple of small scenes that were deleted that I felt would have       > fleshed out the story a bit further.              Do tell. :)              > If part 2 keeps the story going effectively this could potentially be the       > filmic adaption that actually improves on the book. I've made no bones in       > the past that I felt this is the weakest of the latter books. Personally I       > get the impressionm that much of it was written by Rowling around the same       > time as the Philosopher's Stone and she just fleshed out and refined the       > work rather than writing the story from scratch. I felt that the style of       > the book seemed to take a backward step after book 6 (my personal favourite       > of the books) and this is what gave me that impression.              Ms. Rowling has been forthcoming in stating that she had the ending in       her head as she penned SS.              > On the whole there were still elements of the film that required a reading       > of the book to understand so, like some of the previous films, it would have       > presented some difficulties in comprehenstion but on the whole it was pretty       > good. Not Academy award winning stuff mind you but a fair filmic adaption.              To be honest, the reading of the book would create problems in       interpreting the movie. WB/Rowling contrived this scenario --> books       to movie, movie to books expatriation. ;0)              > As films go I'd give it a solid three and a half out of five stars.       >       > P.S. The seven Harrys scene is a pretty decent chuckle on its own.              Not my cup of tea but I am happy that you enjoyed yourself. ;)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca