XPost: alt.magick, alt.religion.wicca, talk.religion.course-miracle   
   From: DROPdraco.malfoy@countermail.comCAPITALLETTERS   
      
   On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:20:27 -0400, Tom wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:14:13 -0400, Draco Malfoy wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:55:43 -0700 (PDT), Tom wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Jun 15, 1:55 pm, Draco Malfoy   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ala Nicholas Flamel who really existed. He was a French alchemist who   
   >>>> allegedly succeeded in making the Philosopher¢s Stone in the late   
   >>>> 1300s.   
   >>   
   >>> If a person really existed, does that mean anything alleged about them   
   >>> must be true?   
   >>   
   >> Does a barking dog mean he ate lima beans? You're post makes about as   
   >> much sense as this one does.   
   >>   
   >>>> According to historical documents and occult tradition,   
   >>>   
   >>> If historical documents really exist, does that mean what they say is   
   >>> true?   
   >>   
   >> Does the barking lima bean dog die from gaseous attacks?   
   >>   
   >>> I have the same question about occult traditions.  Of course it   
   >>> can be a lot harder to tell whether or not an occult tradition is real   
   >>> than it is to tell whether or not a document is real.   
   >>   
   >> Depends entirely on the document and the tradition. Yoiu were much   
   >> better of asking insignificant questions than offering up   
   >> insignificant, sweeping platitudes.   
   >>   
   >>>> Flamel and his Sorcerer's Stone are only two examples of how Rowling   
   >>>> mixes reality with fantasy in her series.   
   >>>   
   >>> And in "The Princess Bride", Inigo Montoya mentions during his sword   
   >>> fight with the Man In Black that he has studied Agrippa.  Agrippa was   
   >>> a real person who was also the author of some historical documents and   
   >>> the subject of occult traditions.  So, by mentioning his name, William   
   >>> Goldman also mixes reality with fantasy in his book.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which means...  what?   
   >>   
   >> Go away.   
   >   
   > If I go away, will I begone or bee gone? When I am away, am I a way,   
   > without weigh(t) or simply away?   
   >   
   > If a person is really away does that mean it is true he is away?   
      
   Why don't you go sit over in the corner with Sidney the PedoLambe and   
   contemplate your navel fuzz.   
      
   Is it fuzz? Is it really naval? Or navel? Or does anyone give a   
   pedofuck?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)