5f178b0c   
   XPost: alt.magick, alt.religion.wicca, talk.religion.course-miracle   
   From: DROPdraco.malfoy@countermail.comCAPITALLETTERS   
      
   On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:12:55 -0700 (PDT), Tom wrote:   
      
   > Harry Potter and J K Rowling?  The former   
   > is a fictional character invented by the latter.  Neither of them has   
   > "alchemical underpinnings".  The books Rowling wrote make mention of   
   > alchemy and drop an occasional historical name.  The character Harry   
   > Potter learns alchemy as one of his Hogwarts studies but it's your   
   > opinion, not a fact, that alchemy is an "underpinning" to his   
   > character.  There is also no evidence whatsoever that J K Rowling   
   > herself believes in or practices alchemy and so has no "alchemical   
   > underpinnings" of her own.  Her demonstrated knowledge of alchemy   
   > seems no greater than what a reasonably intelligent person would find   
   > using any decent encyclopedia as a reference book.   "Facts".  Bah.   
   > You're not dealing in facts here at all   
      
   Thank you for your time, asshole, but when you have a fucking clue wtf   
   you are talking about, come back. Until then, I have some advice for   
   you.   
      
   There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article   
   you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a   
   plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who   
   have never heard of you.   
      
   Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an   
   opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that   
   crap will immediately migrate to the first.   
      
   If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?   
      
   Shut the fuck up.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)