From: bleablah@mume.invalid   
      
   VD pretended :   
   > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:35:52 -0400, Sirius Black wrote:   
      
   >> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:29:39 -0400, VD wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 02:06:22 -0700 (PDT), Benjamin Esham wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> * I felt much more nostalgic for the SS/PS days at the end of this movie   
   >>>>   than I did at the end of the book. I think it's because the epilogue in   
   >>>>   the book is given from Harry's perspective, and so we mostly see how   
   >>>> he's   changed, while the movie still shows pretty much the same scene we   
   >>>> had in   the very first movie. It's easy to mentally replace that   
   >>>> long-haired kid   with 11-year-old Daniel Radcliffe--and not least because   
   >>>> of the music!   
   >>>   
   >>> Did you notice how Harry put Albus and Rose on the train to Hogwarts   
   >>> beginning again the sequence of the Albus "white" Rose (Rosicrucian)   
   >>> initiation...the seekers journey?   
   >>>   
   >>> Food for thought ;)   
   >>   
   >> There you go all Christian and religio on us. lol Bannister will have   
   >> an atheistic hissy.   
      
   > I am positive Mr. Bannister will be fine. ;>)   
      
   > Following the alchemical structure isn't a Christian effort. It's a   
   > liturgical one, the alchemical story can be allegorically ensnared in   
   > any belief set as long as that set follows the seeker's   
   > transfiguration of his soul.   
      
   > It's not my fault Ms. Rowling is an ascribed Christian. ;)   
      
   You can't miss the alchemical approach and yopu can't miss the film's   
   use of sequences from the earlier films either. Nice cohesiveness, I   
   enjoyed this. :oÞ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)