From: EMAILSeekingHarryPotter@rocketmail.comHERE   
      
   On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:35:52 -0400, Sirius Black wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:29:39 -0400, VD wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 02:06:22 -0700 (PDT), Benjamin Esham wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> * I felt much more nostalgic for the SS/PS days at the end of this movie   
   >>>   than I did at the end of the book. I think it's because the epilogue in   
   >>>   the book is given from Harry's perspective, and so we mostly see how he's   
   >>>   changed, while the movie still shows pretty much the same scene we had in   
   >>>   the very first movie. It's easy to mentally replace that long-haired kid   
   >>>   with 11-year-old Daniel Radcliffe--and not least because of the music!   
   >>   
   >> Did you notice how Harry put Albus and Rose on the train to Hogwarts   
   >> beginning again the sequence of the Albus "white" Rose (Rosicrucian)   
   >> initiation...the seekers journey?   
   >>   
   >> Food for thought ;)   
   >   
   > There you go all Christian and religio on us. lol Bannister will have   
   > an atheistic hissy.   
      
   I am positive Mr. Bannister will be fine. ;>)   
      
   Following the alchemical structure isn't a Christian effort. It's a   
   liturgical one, the alchemical story can be allegorically ensnared in   
   any belief set as long as that set follows the seeker's   
   transfiguration of his soul.   
      
   It's not my fault Ms. Rowling is an ascribed Christian. ;)   
   --   
   http://harrypotterforseekers.com/alchemy/alchemy.php   
      
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/harrypotterforseekers/messages?o=1   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)