From: EMAILSeekingHarryPotter@rocketmail.comHERE   
      
   On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:03:25 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
      
   > VD brought next idea :   
   >> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:49:32 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >   
   >>> VD pretended :   
   >>>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:35:52 -0400, Sirius Black wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:29:39 -0400, VD wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 02:06:22 -0700 (PDT), Benjamin Esham wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> * I felt much more nostalgic for the SS/PS days at the end of this   
   movie   
   >>>>>>>   than I did at the end of the book. I think it's because the epilogue   
   >>>>>>> in   the book is given from Harry's perspective, and so we mostly see   
   >>>>>>> how  he's   changed, while the movie still shows pretty much the same   
   >>>>>>> scene we  had in   the very first movie. It's easy to mentally replace   
   >>>>>>> that  long-haired kid   with 11-year-old Daniel Radcliffe--and not   
   least   
   >>>>>>> because  of the music!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Did you notice how Harry put Albus and Rose on the train to Hogwarts   
   >>>>>> beginning again the sequence of the Albus "white" Rose (Rosicrucian)   
   >>>>>> initiation...the seekers journey?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Food for thought ;)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There you go all Christian and religio on us. lol Bannister will have   
   >>>>> an atheistic hissy.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I am positive Mr. Bannister will be fine. ;>)   
   >>>> Following the alchemical structure isn't a Christian effort. It's a   
   >>>> liturgical one, the alchemical story can be allegorically ensnared in   
   >>>> any belief set as long as that set follows the seeker's   
   >>>> transfiguration of his soul.   
   >>>   
   >>>> It's not my fault Ms. Rowling is an ascribed Christian. ;)   
   >>>   
   >>> You can't miss the alchemical approach and yopu can't miss the film's   
   >>> use of sequences from the earlier films either. Nice cohesiveness, I   
   >>> enjoyed this.   
   >   
   >> Ring Composition:   
   >   
   >> 1) the Potter series and each novel have beginnings and ends that meet   
   >> up.   
   >   
   >> 2) the books are centered; i.e. they return to the question raised in   
   >> the beginning and answer that question in the end.   
   >   
   >> 3) each book  has its mirrored image or ´reverse   
   >> echo¡ in the book or chapter on the opposite side of the story divide.   
   >   
   >> ABC|D|CBA   
   >   
   >> Ms. Rowling follows very closely the lead of other alchemical writers;   
   >> ring composition is yet another proof of Ms. Rowling's alchemical   
   >> approach.   
   >   
   > HP is a much different animal that "Lord" but you probably donÿt want a   
   > course in alchemical literature and ring composition, so Iÿll leave it   
   > at that, since this is a post about the movie, not the books. :D   
      
   If you imply that Yates et al were not concerned with the alchemical   
   translations of the book to the movie. I simply don't know. I do not   
   see any overt signs that the movie desires to stick closely to the   
   literary alchemy, the movie is an adaptation after all.   
      
   Yet, in the end all, DH2 does in many ways keep still to the   
   alchemical (and Christian) underpinnings which isn't hard to explain.   
   The book was the original draft of the screen write. ;)   
   --   
   http://harrypotterforseekers.com/alchemy/alchemy.php   
      
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/harrypotterforseekers/messages?o=1   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)