From: bleablah@mume.invalid   
      
   Sirius Black formulated the question :   
   > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:48:30 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
      
   >>> Grade: C   
   >>   
   >> C+   
      
   > Look, I have to admit, two of the three showings I went had   
   > PotterBookNutts shouting out the lines from the book. Then there were   
   > the non book readers who apparently had not read a preview or seen a   
   > trailer, they kept gasping at all the death.   
      
   > It was enough to gag a mongoose I tell ya'!   
      
   Roger Ebert (Chicago Sun-Times): "'Harry Potter' now possesses an end   
   that befits the most profitable series in movie history. ... [A] solid   
   and satisfying conclusion."   
      
   Kenneth Turan (LA Times): "'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows --   
   Part 2' turns out to be more than the last of its kind. Almost   
   magically, it ends up being one of the best of the series as well."   
      
   David Edelstein (New York Magazine): "Expecto Patronum, it is! 'HPATDH   
   2' works like a charm."   
      
   Peter Rainer (Christian Science Monitor): "The collective emotion   
   arising from the last installment of the "Harry Potter" franchise ...   
   is a sense of loss. Even for those of us who have not found the films   
   transcendent, there is some regret."   
      
   *Salon (Andrew O'Hehir): "[T]his final installment, driven far less by   
   acting and characterization than any of the preceding seven, fails the   
   Peter Jackson test of becoming an affecting and absorbing work on its   
   own terms."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)