From: bleablah@mume.invalid   
      
   Wilford Dumont formulated the question :   
   > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:21:01 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
      
   >> Wilford Dumont brought next idea :   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:16:50 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >>>> Wilford Dumont expressed precisely :   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:05:27 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >>>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Purpose?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Readers of afhp need to have a clear understanding of their choices.   
   >>>> They can choose to be entertained and/or enlightened.   
   >>> What is wrong with being entertained only?   
   >>   
   >> Nothing. There is enlightenment to be had, optionally, since JKR has   
   >> written a project that meets all /four/ senses of perception. If a   
   >> reader chooses to open his eyes to see.   
      
   > Not all are capable.   
      
   I'll hold this debate for later it is one I have had with Dix and we   
   would agree to disagree with you, Wil. :-)   
      
   >> The second issue is how to approach the movies. It is a tired and   
   >> ridiculous concept to ruin  the entertainment of the films by   
   >> dragging the four layers into the theater.   
      
   > Some may say that the entertainment in the fantasy of playing out   
   > different scenarios however impossible that are.   
      
   PLay out your fantasies as you wish but including hundreds and hundreds   
   of posts that decry how bad the films are v.s the books in their   
   interpretation of them is neither fantasy nor entertainment. It's   
   purely jealousy and the desire to claim an intellectual high ground   
   that does not exist. It's a waste of time in a delusional reality.   
      
   >> Let the films be the films, let the books be the books. ^^   
      
   > Fine by me.   
      
   So happy to hear. :oÞ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)