From: wilforddumont@gmail.net   
      
   On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:14:08 -0400, Sirius Black wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:05:27 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >   
   >> How so many times do we see the Moaning Myrtles sob "the films and book   
   >> storylines diverted dramatically"...or "movie fail; the book had it   
   >> right and the movie fails over and over"...or "in the book they did   
   >> this and that and the film failed by portraying that as"...or "here is   
   >> where the movie really failed me in telling the *real* story...or "why   
   >> couldn't they do it like the book and say this or do that"...or "why do   
   >> they always sacrificed My book to keep the action up"...or "why can't   
   >> the film be as romantic as the book"...or "total epic movie fail, the   
   >> book was sooooooo much more dramatic"... or "one day someone will   
   >> remake those darn crappy movies into something more to my liking, the   
   >> Book!...   
   >>   
   >> ...and on and on and on in a perpetual state of elementary whine. :-Z   
   >   
   > lol   
   >   
   >> It makes no matter how often you tell these moaners that the film is an   
   >> *adaptation* of the book, that the author (Rowling) had severe critical   
   >> oversight to the *adaptation* - it pleased her but not you, who cares?   
   >> - or that film simply cannot, will not, nor can it be made to *be the   
   >> book*.   
   >   
   > Cruel show, what else have they got to do after a decade of over   
   > analyzing books published, to be published and yet to be published.   
   > Superficial people do superficial things, you know, the Mark Of the   
   > Idiot - doing the same thing over and over again and coming out with   
   > the same results.   
      
   Is that a Dark Mark tattoo and all?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)