From: Emailaaronainsley@countermail.invalid   
      
   On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:43:14 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
      
   > Wilford Dumont expressed precisely :   
   >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:14:08 -0400, Sirius Black wrote:   
   >   
   >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:05:27 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> How so many times do we see the Moaning Myrtles sob "the films and book   
   >>>> storylines diverted dramatically"...or "movie fail; the book had it   
   >>>> right and the movie fails over and over"...or "in the book they did   
   >>>> this and that and the film failed by portraying that as"...or "here is   
   >>>> where the movie really failed me in telling the *real* story...or "why   
   >>>> couldn't they do it like the book and say this or do that"...or "why do   
   >>>> they always sacrificed My book to keep the action up"...or "why can't   
   >>>> the film be as romantic as the book"...or "total epic movie fail, the   
   >>>> book was sooooooo much more dramatic"... or "one day someone will   
   >>>> remake those darn crappy movies into something more to my liking, the   
   >>>> Book!...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ...and on and on and on in a perpetual state of elementary whine. :-Z   
   >>>   
   >>> lol   
   >>>   
   >>>> It makes no matter how often you tell these moaners that the film is an   
   >>>> *adaptation* of the book, that the author (Rowling) had severe critical   
   >>>> oversight to the *adaptation* - it pleased her but not you, who cares?   
   >>>> - or that film simply cannot, will not, nor can it be made to *be the   
   >>>> book*.   
   >>>   
   >>> Cruel show, what else have they got to do after a decade of over   
   >>> analyzing books published, to be published and yet to be published.   
   >>> Superficial people do superficial things, you know, the Mark Of the   
   >>> Idiot - doing the same thing over and over again and coming out with   
   >>> the same results.   
   >   
   >> Is that a Dark Mark tattoo and all?   
   >   
   > The film did a terrible job of showing the Dark Mar, the book was   
   > waaaaaaaaaaay better. Notice how the film never showed the Dark Mark on   
   > the black Death eaters? :D :D :D   
      
   This was solved in the book but the film fucked it up as horribly as   
   eating fudge picked off asphalt. The Book said the Dark Mark on Black   
   Death Eaters was actually pink!   
      
   Dark Pink.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)