From: Emailaaronainsley@countermail.invalid   
      
   On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:23:22 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
      
   > Sirius Black brought next idea :   
   >> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:15:39 -0400, Chan Welbourne wrote:   
   >   
   >>> I do believe there would be interest and value in having JKR comment on   
   >>> the books on a deep level, but I don’t see that happening anytime soon.   
   >>> We would certainly get better answers from her if she allowed   
   >>> interviews with people who will challenge her about the deeper meaning   
   >>> of the books, but will she? And if she does, I hope she gives the   
   >>> series a reread first. B-)   
   >   
   >> Rowling knows her books are full of timeline problems, misdirections   
   >> and downright awful mistakes. She isn't about to let a Victor Dix or   
   >> you or John or Wil get their hands on her. It would be damned   
   >> embarrassing.   
   >   
   > Thanks! :oÞ   
   >   
   > The worst of the worst was when Dumbledore makes this statement toward   
   > the end of the first chapter of PS/SS in response to Minerva’s fussing   
   > over the excessive jubilation attendant upon the fall of the Dark Lord.   
   >   
   > “We’ve had precious little to celebrate for eleven years.” He goes on   
   > to underline the matter by stating on the following page that for   
   > eleven years he has been trying to persuade people to call   
   > He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named by his proper name, Voldemort.   
   >   
   > Looking back, we should have known that JKR was going to play foot   
   > loose and fancy free with timelines from that glaring error alone. :/   
      
   What's wrong with that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)