home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.harry-potter      All that magic and he never got laid...      130,933 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 130,115 of 130,933   
   Chan Welbourne to All   
   Re: FYI Thomas J. Giarmo   
   21 Sep 11 16:46:14   
   
   XPost: sci.med.cardiology, misc.fitness.weights   
   From: bleablah@mume.invalid   
      
   It happens that MU formulated :   
      
   >>> Chan, respect Mu's wishes. He is correct and is not being fanciful.   
   >>> Loose ships sink lips and often those lips are others who are caught   
   >>> in the collateral damage. :(   
   >>   
   >> I don't have a problem with that, usenet isn't the proper medium for   
   >> these kinds of conversations which imo are better done in a live   
   >> interview folowed by Q&A.   
      
   > You're missing the point.   
      
   > I applaud those that come forward whistleblowing *if* they are of   
   > certainty that no one else is compromised. This can be a difficult thing   
   > to do depending on the activities the whistleblower is covering, when   
   > the activities happened and the compartmentalization of said activities.   
      
   > Let's take Andy Basagio for example. He has exposed himself to great   
   > harm but he is single (???) and the events happened in the 60s and 70s.   
   > Lot of dead Project Pegasus scientists and Andy refuses to give up the   
   > other, alive Project Pegasus participants.   
      
   > He does expose the Bush's, New Mexico Gov Bill Richardson, former SOD   
   > Rumsfield, Obama...and a few dozen Martians. lol I don't fear for any of   
   > them.   
      
   > Point being, Basagio made a calculated decision as to timing and   
   > collateral damage and a fine job he has done.   
      
   > However, in most operations that reach some level of classification,   
   > there are people who are alive that could be endangered if exposed,   
   > could still be undercover, the ops could still be ongoing yada yada.   
   > This kind of exposure pisses people off and it is often the wrong people   
   > to piss off.   
      
   > I would think in this day and age any reasonable well read adult would   
   > understand the relationships between drugs-Company, NSA-privacy,   
   > military-ufology, pedophilia-elitists, more yada yada. Yet I hear   
   > reasonably well educated people scoff at the idea that black ops leakers   
   > and whistleblowers get their brains blown out, have "heart attacks" and   
   > flat disappear.   
      
   > Oh well. A day without sunshine is like, night.   
      
   ^^   
      
   Which category do you fall? Safe or unsafe?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca