Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130,115 of 130,933    |
|    Chan Welbourne to All    |
|    Re: FYI Thomas J. Giarmo    |
|    21 Sep 11 16:46:14    |
      XPost: sci.med.cardiology, misc.fitness.weights       From: bleablah@mume.invalid              It happens that MU formulated :              >>> Chan, respect Mu's wishes. He is correct and is not being fanciful.       >>> Loose ships sink lips and often those lips are others who are caught       >>> in the collateral damage. :(       >>       >> I don't have a problem with that, usenet isn't the proper medium for       >> these kinds of conversations which imo are better done in a live       >> interview folowed by Q&A.              > You're missing the point.              > I applaud those that come forward whistleblowing *if* they are of       > certainty that no one else is compromised. This can be a difficult thing       > to do depending on the activities the whistleblower is covering, when       > the activities happened and the compartmentalization of said activities.              > Let's take Andy Basagio for example. He has exposed himself to great       > harm but he is single (???) and the events happened in the 60s and 70s.       > Lot of dead Project Pegasus scientists and Andy refuses to give up the       > other, alive Project Pegasus participants.              > He does expose the Bush's, New Mexico Gov Bill Richardson, former SOD       > Rumsfield, Obama...and a few dozen Martians. lol I don't fear for any of       > them.              > Point being, Basagio made a calculated decision as to timing and       > collateral damage and a fine job he has done.              > However, in most operations that reach some level of classification,       > there are people who are alive that could be endangered if exposed,       > could still be undercover, the ops could still be ongoing yada yada.       > This kind of exposure pisses people off and it is often the wrong people       > to piss off.              > I would think in this day and age any reasonable well read adult would       > understand the relationships between drugs-Company, NSA-privacy,       > military-ufology, pedophilia-elitists, more yada yada. Yet I hear       > reasonably well educated people scoff at the idea that black ops leakers       > and whistleblowers get their brains blown out, have "heart attacks" and       > flat disappear.              > Oh well. A day without sunshine is like, night.              ^^              Which category do you fall? Safe or unsafe?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca