From: arouet@gmail.com   
      
   On Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:24:57 -0500, Jon Donnis wrote:   
      
   > Ron inherited Scabbers, Percy¢s old rat, when he went to school.   
   > Scabbers was really Peter Pettigrew in hiding.   
   >   
   > So, logically, why wouldn¢t Fred or George (or Harry, for that matter)   
   > have been able to see Pettigrew hanging out in Ron¢s room for years?   
   >   
   > Even if Fred and George didn¢t recognize the name Pettigrew as the man   
   > Sirius Black supposedly murdered, wouldn¢t it still have been odd to   
   > have seen a stranger they didn¢t know following their brother around   
   > all the time on the map?   
   >   
   > Stupid fucks.   
      
   Harsh     
      
   What about Harry not being able to see the thestrals?   
      
   You see someone die, you see thestrals. Great. Then why can¢t Harry   
   see thestrals in the carriages on the way to Hogwarts in the first   
   two books? He saw his mother die. Seeing Cedric Diggory die in Goblet   
   of Fire shouldn¢t have been any different.   
      
   Rowling explained this away by saying the only people who could see   
   thestrals were those who had internalized and accepted the death they   
   directly witnessed. Harry was a baby when his parents died so he   
   wasn¢t fully aware of it in the way he was of Cedric¢s death. Then why   
   did it take months for Harry to see thestrals after Cedric¢s death? Is   
   it because he had to process it and accept it? Hasn¢t he done the same   
   for his parents¢ deaths? What¢s the time limit on processing before   
   you see thestrals?   
      
   Bullshit, Rowling.   
   --   
   http://forum.mind-energy.net/members/arouet.html   
   Fuck my kids! Time to post some shit!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)