Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.harry-potter    |    All that magic and he never got laid...    |    130,933 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130,591 of 130,933    |
|    Timothy Bruening to Thomas Madura    |
|    Re: PoA Harry Potter Broomstick Spoiler     |
|    15 Jul 16 23:46:48    |
      From: tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us              On Sunday, January 12, 2003 at 10:54:49 AM UTC-8, Thomas Madura wrote:       > Tim Bruening wrote:       > >        > > Thomas Madura wrote:       > >        > > > Tim Bruening wrote:       > > > >       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > > 1       > > > >       > > > > At the end, Sirius Black reveals that he ordered a new Firebolt       > > > > Broomstick for Harry Potter. Sirius sent in the order via the cat       > > > > Crookshanks, using Potter's name but telling the Owl Office to take the       > > > > gold from Sirius' vault. How in the world was Sirius able to authorize       > > > > the use of his gold for Harry's broomstick without using his (Sirius')       > > > > name? Why weren't Sirius' assets frozen when he was first arrested?       > > >       > > > It would seem that maybe the Wizarding Bank operates like the Swiss       > > > banks do - and freezing assets is not possible. If a Weasley works in       > > > Egypt for Gringotts, it may be Multi-national - or it may not be       > > > controlled by governments at all.       > > >       > > > Also - Sirius' supposed victims were MUGGLES - and they would have no       > > > access to his money in the wizarding world.       > >        > > 3 of his supposed victims were wizards: James Potter, Lilly Potter, and       Peter       > > Pettigrew. Shouldn't Harry, and Peter's parents be entitled to reparations       > > from Black's account?       >        > Gee - I thought Voldemort killed the Potters - and last time I looked -       > Pettigrew was still alive at the end of GOF.              Until the end of PoA, everyone thought that Sirius Back had killed Peter       Pettigrew and 12 Muggles with an explosive curse. Only a finger of Peter was       left. Fudge was still having nightmares about that explosion 12 years later!        Furthermore, the MoM        thought (based on Dumbledore's testimony) that Sirius had been the Potter's       Secret Keeper, so was the one to betray the Potters to Voldemort.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca