From: tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us   
      
   On Wednesday, April 5, 2006 at 7:30:03 PM UTC-7, richard e white wrote:   
   > tbarry22@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >    
   > > drusilla wrote:   
   > > > Brent Braten escribió:   
   > > > > I know it is rather trivial, being as it happened the night before the   
   first   
   > > > > book opens, but I am wondering how Hagrid knew where to find the   
   Potters   
   > > > > (Harry) if Peter was the Secret Keeper?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The point I am trying to get at is that in book three - when Fudge is   
   > > > > visiting with McG. in the Three Broomsticks - McG. says the Sirius was   
   the   
   > > > > Potters' secret keeper.  But if Hagrid knew where to find them then   
   Peter   
   > > > > must have told him.  This, in the very least, should have cast some   
   doubt   
   > > > > upon Sirius' guilt and earned him a trial.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I'm almost sorry for pointing out this glaring inconsistancy but   
   therer it   
   > > > > is.  Any thoughts?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > BB   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > I suppse the spell dies when the Secret Keeper tells the secret.   
   > >   
   > > It doesn't.  The secret keeper can tell whomever he or she wants.  The   
   > > person hearing it cannot reveal it.  So Voldemort technically could not   
   > > have told anyone else...Wormtail is the only one who can reveal the   
   > > whereabouts.  But since the house was destroyed, could that have ended   
   > > the secret?   
   >    
   > I think it was either that or the deaths of harry's parents.  I like the   
   idea of the   
   > secret ending and the place showing back up as it ansers most of the random   
   > questions.  but who knows for sure.   
      
   Harry himself was still alive.  Shouldn't the FC still have covered him   
   (making him Unfindable by anyone Peter hadn't Told)?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)