ca35cd3f   
   From: tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us   
      
   On Tuesday, December 4, 2007 at 9:50:37 AM UTC-8, lomnoir wrote:   
   > On Dec 3, 10:09 pm, Sirius Kase  wrote:   
   > > On Dec 3, 9:57 pm, dicc...@radix.net (Richard Eney) wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > Slytherin:  locket   
   > > > Ravenclaw:  tiara   
   > > > Hufflepuff: goblet   
   > > > Gryffindor: Harry   
   > >   
   > > > =Tamar   
   > >   
   > > Yes, someone finally spotted the Gryffindor horcrux.  I thought of   
   > > that after I read your Subject, but before I read your post.   
   > >   
   > > Then of course   
   > >   
   > > Muggle Object: diary   
   > > Living Object: Nagini   
   > > Hallowed Object: Ring   
   > >   
   > > Of course, Harry is also a Living Object, so maybe Nagini is an Animal   
   > > object, but that doesn't sound as cool.   
   >   
   > True, Harry is also a living object. The thing is, Voldemort intended   
   > to make six horcruxes out of the four house objects (yet failed to get   
   > a Gryffindor artifact), the diary, and the ring. He wanted to split   
   > his soul into seven pieces: six horcruxes plus the remnant of his soul   
   > that he carried around with him. From what I know, he had five when he   
   > hunted down the Potters: the ring, diadem, cup, locket, and diary.   
   > Perhaps he intended to make the sixth with the death of the year-old   
   > Harry, thereby making himself (in his mind) invincible: killing the   
   > only one that would threaten his life and six pieces of his soul earth-   
   > bound and forever hidden.   
      
   What object was Voldemort planning to turn into a Horcrux that night?  Said   
   object should still have been in the house afterwards.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)