home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.harry-potter      All that magic and he never got laid...      130,933 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 130,921 of 130,933   
   moviePig to All   
   Re: JK Rowling Said She "Wouldn't Fire"    
   07 May 25 16:06:13   
   
   XPost: alt.transgendered, alt.tv.hbo, rec.arts.tv   
   From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 5/7/2025 2:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On May 7, 2025 at 7:10:10 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> HARRY POTTER author JK Rowling said that even if she had the authority to   
   >> have an actor removed from the upcoming HBO television series based on her   
   >> best-selling books, she would not do it over ideological differences.   
   >>   
   >> "I don't have the power to sack an actor from the series and I wouldn't   
   >> exercise it if I did," the billionaire author wrote on X in response to an   
   >> article about Paapa Essiedu supporting rights for people who identify as   
   >> transgender. "I don’t believe in taking away people's jobs or livelihoods   
   >> because they hold legally protected beliefs that differ from mine."   
   >>   
   >> On Saturday, Rowling had reacted to the open letter with another X post. "In   
   >> light of recent open letters from academia and the arts criticising the UK's   
   >> Supreme Court ruling on sex-based rights, it's possibly worth remembering   
   >> that nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex,   
   >> or that binary sex isn't a material fact.   
   >>   
   >> “History is littered with the debris of irrational and harmful belief   
   systems   
   >>   
   >> that once seemed unassailable. As Orwell said, 'Some ideas are so stupid   
   that   
   >> only intellectuals believe them.' Gender ideology may have embedded itself   
   >> deeply into our institutions, where it's been imposed, top-down, on the   
   >> supposedly unenlightened, but it is not invulnerable. I wonder if they ever   
   >> ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether   
   >> any of them will ever feel shame."   
   >   
   > Respect.   
      
   She asserts that "binary sex [is] a material fact."  And, at least in   
   the most common sense, that may be indisputable.  But what's overlooked   
   is that no human is ever rendered as a perfect '0' or '1'.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca