From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
   By Richard Edmonds   
      
         The facts on the "Holocaust" have been exposed years ago in a   
   trial in Toronto, Canada. The defendant in the dock was the   
   German-Canadian, Ernst Zundel, accused by the State prosecutor of   
   disputing the claim that during the Second World War the Germans had   
   murdered millions of Jews in purpose-built gas-chambers.   
      
       This trial, held in 1985 against Ernst Zundel, is of greatest   
   importance due to the evidence given at the court by an expert   
   witness. Professor Raul Hilberg of the  University of Vermont, USA,   
   was recognized by the court to be the world expert on the alleged   
   "Holocaust". In open court and under oath, Professor Hilberg stated   
   that he knew of no independent, forensic scientific for the existence   
   anywhere of a gas-chamber, planned built and operated by the Germans   
   during the Second World War for the purpose of killing, murdering or   
   executing Jews or any other persons. Professor Hilberg further stated   
   that with regard to causes of death in the whole extent of   
   German-occupied Europe during the Second World War, he was unable to   
   supply the court with a single autopsy certificate, stating the cause   
   of death of a single individual to be due to poisoning by cyanide gas.   
   Cyanide gas was the highly toxic gas allegedly used in the alleged   
   German gas-chambers.   
      
      The origin of the "Holocaust" allegation is to be found in the   
   trial that the victorious Allies organized against the defeated   
   Germans foes in the years following the War, at the German city of   
   Nuremberg. The victorious allies were, of course, the United Stated of   
   America, the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin, Great Britain and France.   
   At this trial of the defeated German leaders, the Allies were   
   simultaneously Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, and Hangman in their own case   
   and in their own court. The Allies' Nuremberg trial was publicly   
   condemned at the time by principled, leading Americans. The Chief   
   Justice of the US Supreme Court, Judge Harlan F. Stone, condemned the   
   trial as a "lynching". US Senator Robert Taft condemned the Allies'   
   trial, as a "travesty and a perversion of justice". Taft described   
   America's participation as a blot on the honor of the United States.   
   Senator Taft predicted that in the future Europeans would condemn   
   America for its participation in a "lynching".   
      
        The standard rules of evidence were discarded. For example, the   
   Allies held that their allegations of German atrocities, printed and   
   published to saturation point in the Allies' war time-time press, were   
   to be accepted at face value as "Public Knowledge" and were of such a   
   notoriety that without any further independent, judicial   
   investigation, the Allies' court could accept them as of probative   
   value. If the Allies said it, then it could not be questioned.   
      
       To their undying shame, the Allies employed torture to extract   
   self-condemning confessions of guilt from their helpless prisoners. I   
   will present here two notorious examples of vicious torture.   
      
      We know that Rudolf Hoess, a former Kommandant at the Auschwitz was   
   captured by a special unit of the British Army at the end of the   
   Second World War, and we know that Hoess was tortured and beaten   
   almost to the point of death, and then given a choice: either to   
   confess to committing the murder of millions of Jews as Auschwitz, or   
   else, he and his family, wife and children would suffer the   
   consequences. Hoess' statement obtained under torture was presented   
   and accepted at the Allies' court as proving the claim that Auschwitz   
   in Poland is the location of the mass murder of millions. In response   
   to rumors of abuses inflicted on German prisoners of war held captive   
   by the US Army in post-War Germany, the American judge, Edward van   
   Roden was commissioned by the US Army to investigate the situation.   
   Van Roden examined German prisoners, and found that many had been   
   tortured; that more than a hundred had had their testicles crushed   
   beyond repair. These men had been tortured, as in the case of the   
   Auschwitz Kommandant Hoess, in order to extract from them the   
   self-condemning confessions of guilt that the Allies needed to   
   buttress their propaganda-lies. On his return to the USA, Judge van   
   Roden published his findings at press-conferences held in New York and   
   Chicago.   
      
    The "Holocaust" allegation is nothing but a propaganda-lie concocted   
   by the war- time Allies Nuremberg lynching by the cynical trampling on   
   all the principles of American and British jurisprudence.   
      
     The disgrace that remains is that 70 years later across most of   
   mainland Europe it is a criminal offense to question the findings of   
   the Allies Nuremberg trial.   
      
      
      
   www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org   
      
   http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)