Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.adolf-hitler    |    Apparently for more than the moustache    |    4,278 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,097 of 4,278    |
|    Topaz to All    |
|    The Iron Guard (1/4)    |
|    26 Dec 16 01:24:03    |
   
   From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
    What is now commonly referred to as the "Iron Guard,"   
   more properly called the "Legionary Movement," was a unique   
   Romanian nationalist political group founded by Corneliu Zelea   
   Codreanu in the early twentieth century. Within Romania, the   
   Legionary Movement has, despite failing to regain its original status   
   after the fall of Communism, embedded itself into the nation's   
   memory as an essentially positive force which aimed to create a   
   better Romania. Its influence among the Romanian masses had been   
   so significant that even many notable cultural and historical   
   figures, including historians, clergymen and church leaders,   
   philosophers and poets, had been associated with it. In addition,   
   one may find the Movement or its founder referenced in numerous now   
   well-known Romanian songs, poems, and writings from throughout the   
   entire twentieth century since its founding.   
      
    A significant portion of the Jewish population, although not a   
   majority, was wealthy and economically influential.   
      
    By the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, the   
   presence of Jews in the fields of law, business, finance,   
   journalism, and eventually politics would increase. This   
   increase of Jews in important areas of culture caused the   
   majority of average Romanians, who were largely of the lower   
   classes, to feel as though a caste of foreigners was living off   
   of their labor. In the early twentieth century, suspicions that   
   Jews were slowly transforming Romanian culture and Romanian thinking   
   by introducing Jewish elements into Romanian thought and education   
   also increased. Romanians essentially felt that an alien and generally   
   hostile people now constituted a threat to their ethno-cultural   
   integrity.   
      
    Tensions between peasants and large landowners were even worse   
   than in Russia; landholdings were grossly unequal, and the peas-   
   antry was brutally exploited. As in the Pale of Settlement, Jews in   
   Romania served as agents for the large landowners, and were de-   
   scribed as alien, parasitic, and contemptuous of the non-Jewish   
   people among whom they lived.   
      
    As Prince Carol stated the matter, paralleling the views of the   
   Slavophiles, Jews were a people whose superior industry and   
   inferior morals allowed them to exploit and take advantage of the   
   simple and good-natured Romanian people. It was a   
   perspective shared by most Romanian nationalists. . . . Jewish   
   belittlement of Romanian culture particularly incensed the spokesmen   
   for Romanian nationalism.   
      
    They also warned Romanians of the rapid increase of the   
   numbers of Jews in schools and universities in proportion to Romanian   
   students, which meant that Jews would become increasingly   
   overrepresented in the next generations of intellectual, economic,   
   and political leadership. This meant not only that most Romanians   
   would hold inferior positions in comparison to the Jews, but   
   also that the latter would constitute an even more serious threat   
   to Romanian culture in the future.   
      
    These same intellectuals also generally held the view that the   
   wealth and influence of the Jews was the result of an   
   organized conspiracy on the part of important Jews, one which   
   extended to an international level due to the bond between Jews   
   across national borders.   
      
    Alongside the issue of the Jews, the problem of the increasing   
   infection of political corruption and ineffectiveness in the   
   Romanian polity caused many Romanians to recognize the   
   Legionary Movement as one of the few organizations that could offer   
   a serious solution to the economic, political, and social problems of   
   the early twentieth century in Romania. It was under these   
   circumstances that anti-Semitic and nationalist political parties,   
   and later the Iron Guard, became increasingly popular in   
   Romania during the early twentieth century.   
      
    Corneliu Zelea Codreanu was born in Hu i, a town in the region   
   of Moldavia, on September 13, 1899, and was educated at the local   
   schools. From age 11 to 16, he was sent to a military academy in   
   Manastirea Dealului ("Cloister on the Hill") where, according   
   to his autobiography, military virtues such as respect for   
   authority and hierarchy, discipline,   
      
    After serving as an underage volunteer in the Romanian army   
   during World War I, Codreanu graduated from high school in 1919 and   
   moved on to attend the University of Iasi as a law student. There   
   he found that the majority of professors and a large portion of the   
   students had converted to Communism. He also found that a large number   
   of Romanian workers had become Communists, with Marxist   
   intellectuals and propagandists attacking nationalism, the monarchy   
   (at this time, Romania was alarmed not only by the spread of   
   Communism, but also by the fact that a large number of Communist   
   leaders were Jews, which led him and many other nationalists to   
   conclude that Jews were conspiring to use a Communist revolution as   
   a way of achieving dictatorial power.   
      
    He decided to join the Guard of National Conscience, a   
   small anti-Communist organization led by Constantin Pancu, which   
   organized rallies as well as engaged in physical fights with   
   Communists. The organization offered the program of "National   
   Christian Socialism" as its response to Communism. This was a   
   form of nationalistic and non-Marxist socialism which they   
   formulated because they realized that nationalists must also   
   "fight for the rights of the workers" and "against the oligarchic   
   parties, creating national workers' organizations which can   
   gain their rights within the framework of the state and not against   
   the state," for they realized that their nation's future depended   
   on liberating the workers and peasants from the poverty which the   
   corrupt politicians of the time put them in.   
      
    A decisive event in the downfall of the popularity of   
   Communism occurred in 1920, after the Guard marched in to   
   intervene in a strike by Marxist workers at the Nicolina railway   
   works, with members of the Guard removing Red flags and replacing   
   them with the Romanian tri-colors. After Codreanu courageously and   
   singlehandedly climbed to the roof of a factory and replaced the Red   
   flag, the workers were so impressed with the efforts of the   
   Guard's members that they let them leave without a battle.   
      
    During the academic year of 1920-21, Codreanu and   
   his friends among the nationalist students managed to end a Communist   
   student strike in the university, wrecked the presses of   
   Jewish-Communist publishers in response to Marxist propaganda   
   in their newspapers, and even beat up the editors of Opinia   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca