Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.adolf-hitler    |    Apparently for more than the moustache    |    4,278 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,106 of 4,278    |
|    Topaz to All    |
|    Race (1/2)    |
|    05 Feb 17 21:56:48    |
      From: mars1933@hotmail.com               Psychologist J. Philippe Rushton once observed that science moves       forward, continuing to gather data and refine its theories, but with       one important exception. A century ago, there was a robust Darwinian       science of race differences in a variety of traits, from differences       in skull shape and cranial capacity, to differences in intelligence       and behavioral restraint. However, this young science was nipped in       the bud, but not because it was displaced by a new, powerful, and       empirically based theory. Rather, the demise of racial science came       about because of intellectual movements dominated by ethnic Jews and       tightly linked to the political left.               This was a case of science being replaced by ideology, an       ideology designed to oppose the idea that Europeans were in any way       unique or superior to other human groups; an ideology designed to       advance the interests of ethnic outsiders with their own strong sense       of biological uniqueness and superiority. Ultimately, it was an       ideology that rationalized the decline of Europeans and their culture       that we see all around us today. The new ideology decreed that humans       were infinitely malleable creatures of their culture and eventually       became defined by the view that race does not exist at all.               Franz Boas, the high priest of the new cult, was a strongly       identified Jew and committed leftist. His famous study purporting to       show that skull shape changed as a result of immigration from Europe       to America was very effective propaganda weapon in the cause of       eradicating racial science. Indeed, it was intended as propaganda.       Based on their reanalysis of Boas’s data, physical anthropologists       Corey Sparks and Richard Jantz do not accuse Boas of scientific fraud,       but they do find that his data do not show any significant       environmental effects on cranial form as a result of immigration. They       also claim that Boas may well have been motivated by a desire to       expunge racialist views from academic anthropology:               While Boas never stated explicitly that he had based any       conclusions on anything but the data themselves, it is obvious that he       had a personal agenda in the displacement of the eugenics movement in       the United States. In order to do this, any differences observed       between European- and U.S.-born individuals will be used to its       fullest extent to prove his point.               As a result of the massive success of this onslaught, the science       of race differences languished, whatever truths it had uncovered were       forgotten. In Raciology, Vladimir Avdeyev resurrects the vast       tradition of research on the physical anthropology and psychology of       race differences. His book is an exhaustive summary of research in       this field from the eighteenth century to the present. It includes a       great many summaries of the research of individual scientists, many of       whom have been virtually forgotten. But it is far more than a       compendium of research. It also vigorously defends the idea that the       problem of race is the nerve center of world history. It is intended       therefore to influence how people think about race in the context of       history and current events.               Several themes recur throughout Raciology. Race is overwhelmingly       the result of biological inheritance, not cultural programming.       Beginning with Count Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, this body of theory       and research proposed that the biologically based racial       characteristics of Whites have led them to be originators of superior       cultures. The White race evolved in the north of Europe and spread       south and east to be the main force behind the ancient cultures of       Greece, Rome, Egypt, India, Persia, and the Hittites. The ancestral       type of the White race, called the Nordic race originally by Joseph       Deniker, is characterized by blond hair, blue eyes, light skin, tall       stature, dolichocephalic (long-headed) skull, and a brain with a       welldeveloped prefrontal area (the area of the brain associated with       intelligence, impulse control, and decision making). Houston Stewart       Chamberlain may be considered paradigmatic of a theorist who proposed       that northern Europeans are a superior people:               All outstanding peoples that appeared starting in the 6th century       in the role of true deciders of the fate of humanity as founders of       nations and creators of new thinking and original art, were namely of       German origin. The creations of the Arabs stand out for their short       duration; the Mongols only destroyed but they created nothing; the       ingenious Italians of the Middle Ages were all émigrés, or of the       north which was saturated with Lombard, Gothic, or Frankish blood, or       they were Germano-Hellenes of the south; in Spain, the creative       element was the Visigoths. The awakening of the Germans forms the       foundation of European history, for their worldwide historical       significance as founders of a completely new civilization and a       completely new culture.               However, despite the great flowering of culture emanating from       Europe and despite the knowledge that Europeans and their culture       dominated the planet, there is also a pessimism that pervades this       literature, the idea that White racial elites tend to become degraded       over historical time because of admixture with other races. It was       common among these thinkers to assert that the depletion of the Nordic       racial stratum accounts for the decline of Greece, Rome, the Hindus,       the Persians, and other Nordic civilizations. For example, Ludwig       Woltmann: The blonde element of the people defines its cultural       worthiness, and the fall of great cultures is explained by the dying       out of this element. Eugen Fischer: In Greece, the death of the       families of fully-vested citizens and the admission of the descendants       of slaves and the aboriginal population as citizens, led . . . to       collapse. Rome died of race mixing and the products of degeneracy.        And finally, Otto Reche, writing in 1936:               That which we call "world history" is in essence nothing more than       the history of the Indo-Germans and their achievements; the powerfully       rousing and simultaneously tragic song about the Nordic race and its       idealism; a song which tells about how the strength of the race did       what seemed impossible and reached for the stars, and how the strength       quickly dried up when the "law of race" was forgotten, when the Nordic       man ceased to preserve the purity of his blood and strongly mixes with       races [that are] less gifted in cultural terms.               Lenz gives major weight to the selective pressures of the Ice Age       on northern peoples. He proposed that the intellectual abilities of       these peoples are due to a great need to master the natural       environment, resulting in selection for traits related to mechanical       ability, structural design, and inventiveness in problem solving (what       psychologists term "performance IQ"), whereas he argued that Jewish       intelligence was the result of intensive social living (what              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca