XPost: alt.eat-shit.and-die.asshole
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10n83gv$2jkq9$3@paganini.bofh.team>,
slutl@whitehouse.org says...
>
> Skeeter wrote:
>
> >In article <10n4ofr$2p2ca$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-02-18 01:35, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > In article <10n32d0$26nco$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >> > uh@nope.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2026-02-17 16:23, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >>> In article <10n2vnj$26n7o$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 2026-02-17 15:25, Mars Sellus wrote:
> >> >>>>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:38:17 -0800
> >> >>>>> Alan wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The Democrats are already reporting that while they are seeing
> the
> >> >>>>>> files free from any redactions done by the DoJ, the FBI has
> already
> >> >>>>>> redacted them.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> What part of outing underaged victims needlessly do you not get,
> >> >>>>> scuzzbunny
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> No one disagrees with redacting the victims information...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ...but this was much more than that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> How can you say? Do you work there? What makes you an
> >> >>> expert? CNN?
> >> >>
> >> >> I can read...
> >> >>
> >> >> ...which you can, it can't be denied...
> >> >>
> >> >> ...and I DO read...
> >> >>
> >> >> ...which you don't.
> >> >
> >> > Huh? You drinking again?
> >>
> >> Was that too difficult for you to understand.
> >>
> >> Well, I didn't say your reading was at a very high level, now did I?
> >
> >And no one asked you. Now try that in English.
>
> I bet you're a fucking Queer.
You would lose. Queer is so old, try something new.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
