e-NOT-delegated.example.com> 8b5640ea   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.fan.michael-moore, alt.politics.liberalism   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc   
   From: chine.bleu@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <28CdnfqdmboWL9jRnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@posted.carinet>,   
    "5594 Dead, 727 since 1/20/09"  wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:06:42 -0700, liberal wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > >> I'm an atheist. I don't need a god. But if someone else needs to feel   
   > >> something like a god to make their life better why would I care?   
   > >   
   > > The fundamental problem isn't whether someone believes in god or   
   > > gods...it's whether they think their dogma entitles them to force me to   
   > > adhere to their beliefs.   
   >   
   > You've been discussing this for several days now with both lefty and   
   > myself, and we both agree that religionists are fully entitled to their   
   > beliefs and that we have no right to force them to accept anything more   
   > than our right to hold ours.   
      
   Mentally ill people can be held against their will. What professional training   
   do you have to declare who is mentally ill?   
      
   --   
   Damn the living - It's a lovely life.           I'm whoever you want me to be.   
   Silver silverware - Where is the love?       At least I can stay in character.   
   Oval swimming pool - Where is the love?    Annoying Usenet one post at a time.   
   Damn the living - It's a lovely life.                   We support you, Sarah.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)