XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:22:33 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:37:58 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >   
   >> "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"   wrote :   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:39:29 -0500, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> or yOn Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:08:04 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:24:11 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"   wrote :   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:46:57 -0600, "Jane_Galt"   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Free Spirits of the Jungle"   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote :   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 11:13 am, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:14:43 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> > Being "Man Made Global Warming" falls more into the realm of   
   >>>>>>>>>> > religioon than science, only those with political agendas of   
   >>>>>>>>>> > socialist style redistribution of wealth tend to "believe in"   
   >>>>>>>>>> > it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Hey. I just said something similar to that...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So the OVERWHELMING number of scientists are ALL part of a   
   >>>>>>>>> CONSPIRACY to fool the general populace,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Overwhelming? Does the number of people who say something make it   
   >>>>>>>>RIGHT?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If they happen to have the data backing them, then yes, it does.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Would that be the manipulated data that they were telling each other   
   >>>>>> to propagate in the ClimateGate emails?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The "Climategate" that was long ago discredited, bubbles?  That   
   >>>>> Climategate?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Who 'discredited' it? Did you read the emails for yourself?   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, actually, I did.  And they were discredited by no less than three   
   >>> independent commissions, two by the British government, and one by the   
   >>> UN.  All three concluded that there was nothing to indicate any   
   >>> malfeasance of any sort by the people involved who wrote the stolen   
   >>> emails.   
   >>   
   >> Um, agents of the same Progressive governments that benefit from the   
   >> redistribution of wealth globalization agenda?   
   >   
   > Oooh!  It's a vast world-wide CONSPIRACY!  Booga-booga!   
      
      
   Wow. He finally got it.   
      
   Why do you suppose the Chicago Carbon Exchange folded?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)