XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:11:51 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:45:34 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >   
   >> Alan Baker   wrote :   
   >>   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>  "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> >>>>>Overwhelming? Does the number of people who say something make it   
   >>>> >>>>>RIGHT?   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>> If they happen to have the data backing them, then yes, it does.   
   >>>> >>>   
   >>>> >>> Would that be the manipulated data that they were telling each   
   >>>> >>> other to propagate in the ClimateGate emails?   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> The "Climategate" that was long ago discredited, bubbles?  That   
   >>>> >> Climategate?   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > Who 'discredited' it? Did you read the emails for yourself?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, actually, I did.  And they were discredited by no less than three   
   >>>> independent commissions, two by the British government, and one by the   
   >>>> UN.  All three concluded that there was nothing to indicate any   
   >>>> malfeasance of any sort by the people involved who wrote the stolen   
   >>>> emails.   
   >>>   
   >>> I suggest you carefully examine the frames of reference of those   
   >>> "independent commissions"...   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> They likely point back to Soros.   
   >   
   > Oh, look: "Jane" is a Glenn Beck crackpot!   
      
      
   Better than being a k00k that thinks global warming is entirely man-made.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)