XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:31:49 -0800, Alan Baker wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   >  "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> >>>>>Overwhelming? Does the number of people who say something make it   
   >> >>>>>RIGHT?   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> If they happen to have the data backing them, then yes, it does.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Would that be the manipulated data that they were telling each other   
   >> >>> to propagate in the ClimateGate emails?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> The "Climategate" that was long ago discredited, bubbles?  That   
   >> >> Climategate?   
   >> >   
   >> > Who 'discredited' it? Did you read the emails for yourself?   
   >>   
   >> Yes, actually, I did.  And they were discredited by no less than three   
   >> independent commissions, two by the British government, and one by the   
   >> UN.  All three concluded that there was nothing to indicate any   
   >> malfeasance of any sort by the people involved who wrote the stolen   
   >> emails.   
   >   
   > I suggest you carefully examine the frames of reference of those   
   > "independent commissions"...   
      
      
   Seems a few people have mentioned that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)