XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 05:16:57 -0500, Steve wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:11:51 -0600, "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:45:34 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Alan Baker   wrote :   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article ,   
   >>>>  "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> >>>>>Overwhelming? Does the number of people who say something make   
   >>>>> >>>>>it RIGHT?   
   >>>>> >>>>   
   >>>>> >>>> If they happen to have the data backing them, then yes, it does.   
   >>>>> >>>   
   >>>>> >>> Would that be the manipulated data that they were telling each   
   >>>>> >>> other to propagate in the ClimateGate emails?   
   >>>>> >>   
   >>>>> >> The "Climategate" that was long ago discredited, bubbles?  That   
   >>>>> >> Climategate?   
   >>>>> >   
   >>>>> > Who 'discredited' it? Did you read the emails for yourself?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yes, actually, I did.  And they were discredited by no less than   
   >>>>> three independent commissions, two by the British government, and one   
   >>>>> by the UN.  All three concluded that there was nothing to indicate   
   >>>>> any malfeasance of any sort by the people involved who wrote the   
   >>>>> stolen emails.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I suggest you carefully examine the frames of reference of those   
   >>>> "independent commissions"...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> They likely point back to Soros.   
   >>   
   >>Oh, look: "Jane" is a Glenn Beck crackpot!   
   >   
   > It's probably a good sign that some lefterloons are distancing themselves   
   > from Soros.   
      
      
   Nah, it's a bad thing. Like a sheep in wolf's clothing...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)