XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:42:07 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
      
   > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?=   wrote   
   > :   
   > :   
   >> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:11:51 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:45:34 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Alan Baker   wrote :   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>  "5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09"  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> >>>>>Overwhelming? Does the number of people who say something make   
   > it   
   >>>>>> >>>>>RIGHT?   
   >>>>>> >>>>   
   >>>>>> >>>> If they happen to have the data backing them, then yes, it   
   >>>>>> >>>> does.   
   >>>>>> >>>   
   >>>>>> >>> Would that be the manipulated data that they were telling each   
   >>>>>> >>> other to propagate in the ClimateGate emails?   
   >>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>> >> The "Climategate" that was long ago discredited, bubbles?  That   
   >>>>>> >> Climategate?   
   >>>>>> >   
   >>>>>> > Who 'discredited' it? Did you read the emails for yourself?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, actually, I did.  And they were discredited by no less than   
   > three   
   >>>>>> independent commissions, two by the British government, and one by   
   > the   
   >>>>>> UN.  All three concluded that there was nothing to indicate any   
   >>>>>> malfeasance of any sort by the people involved who wrote the stolen   
   >>>>>> emails.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I suggest you carefully examine the frames of reference of those   
   >>>>> "independent commissions"...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> They likely point back to Soros.   
   >>>   
   >>> Oh, look: "Jane" is a Glenn Beck crackpot!   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Better than being a k00k that thinks global warming is entirely   
   >> man-made.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   > Reality check: Glenn Beck has been right almost all the time, and has been   
   > mercilessly smeared by the Progressive socialists because THEY HAVE NO   
   > VALID ARGUMENTS against what he says. Ad hominems are the last resort of   
   > the loser of an argument.   
   >   
   > IN FACT, if 1% of what he said had been lies, and if he'd been stupid, as   
   > they say, he would have been sued or tossed off the air. Instead he has an   
   > audience base that reaches about 33 million Americans. He's a hero and   
   > patriot IMO, despite all the lies and smears of the Progressive   
   > socialists/communists.   
      
      
   Anbd the loons just don't want to admit Soros is pulling the strings.   
      
   Bush may have been Cheny's puppet, but at least that's better than being   
   Soros'...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)