XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism
XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore
From: Trueno@e86.GTS
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:33:36 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:34:19 +0000, Matthew Russotto wrote:
>
>> In article , 5813 Dead,
>> 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:59:37 +0000, Matthew Russotto wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article ,
>>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?=
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm just wondering what all these Chicken Littles are going to do when
>>>>>the Big Freeze comes and there's no oil left.
>>>>
>>>> Yelling "I told you so" and trying to ban the burning of coal.
>>>
>>>In the meantime, you'll be bitterly blaming Democrats for cutting taxes
>>>and creating unsustainable debt that crashed the economy.
>>
>> I'll be blaming Democrats for cutting taxes? Really? Seems unlikely.
>> I'm more likely to be blaming them for spending like drunken sailors.
>> Even more likely to be working on obtaining coal.
>
> And yet even David Stockman is saying the problem isn't Democratic
> spending, but Republican tax cuts, that caused the huge national debt.
Huh? How does that even make sense?
Regardless of what the Republicans did, you can't spend what you don;t
have! David Stockman must be a real dumbass to say something as asinine as
that.
>
> I see yesterday where the Republicans listed the spending cuts that would
> justify a $30 billion a year tax cut to be continued for the richest 400
> people in America, and they came to $1.2 billion a year.
What Liberal blog was that found on?
You really swallow that "tax cut for the rich" BS, don't you? I'm not rich
and I saved a shitload on taxes.
>
> Maybe you can do better.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
