XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: Trueno@e86.GTS   
      
   On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:55:32 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:53:51 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote:   
   >   
   >> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?=    
   >> wrote :   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:33:36 -0600, 5813 Dead, 956 since 1/20/09 wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> And yet even David Stockman is saying the problem isn't Democratic   
   >>>> spending, but Republican tax cuts, that caused the huge national debt.   
   >>>   
   >>> Huh? How does that even make sense?   
   >>   
   >> ROFL! Bush Derrangement Syndrome taken to a whole new level!   
   >   
   > Reagan's Budget Manager suffers from Bush "derrangement" syndrome?   
      
   If he thinks the government can spend more than it takes in. Obungler   
   should look at what he has for funding first and then spend accordingly.   
      
   >>   
   >>> Regardless of what the Republicans did, you can't spend what you don;t   
   >>> have! David Stockman must be a real dumbass to say something as asinine   
   >>> as that.   
   >   
   > He nailed it.  Spending DID go up under Reagan, but nearly all of it was   
   > for the military, or financing the national debt.  It was such a   
   > catastrophe that Reagan wound up overseeing one of the biggest tax hikes   
   > in US history, although of course he spared the rich, shifting the burden   
   > to the middle class.   
      
   More Al Franken BS. I made more money than than I am now, and I'm not rich   
   by any means.   
      
   >   
   > Pretty much the same under Bush Junior.  Huge tax cuts, but then the dumb   
   > asshole started two wars in Asia and increase the government size by   
   > nearly a third, mostly for the purpose of spying upon the American people.   
      
   You were doing pretty good up until that last comma.   
      
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> I see yesterday where the Republicans listed the spending cuts that   
   >>>> would justify a $30 billion a year tax cut to be continued for the   
   >>>> richest 400 people in America, and they came to $1.2 billion a year.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> What Liberal blog was that found on?   
   >>>   
   >>> You really swallow that "tax cut for the rich" BS, don't you? I'm not   
   >>> rich and I saved a shitload on taxes.   
   >>   
   >> Classic class warfare.   
   >>   
   >> As it happens ( and the Progressives refuse to hear it ) a LOT of small   
   >> businesses are making $1 million as LLC's where the owners hire people   
   >> out of those incomes. For example a law firm where 2 owners are an LLC   
   >> and together they make $1 million and hire a couple of paralegals out of   
   >> that, for $40k each. So go ahead and raise taxes on them Class Warriors,   
   >> no more hiring!   
   >>   
   >> Gosh, we borrowed and spent all this money, how come it didn't create   
   >> jobs Opie?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)