XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: russotto@grace.speakeasy.net   
      
   In article ,   
   Jane_Galt  wrote:   
   >russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto)  wrote :   
   >   
   >> In article ,   
   >> dr_jeff   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>Anyway, I don't hope that nuclear energy takes off. It is not 100%   
   >>>clean. Nothing is. Unless we can get fusion to work in a big way,   
   >>>nuclear should provide a large part of our energy. Unfortunately, we   
   >>>will have to build a new electrical grid backbone.   
   >>   
   >> Nothing will ever be 100% clean.   
   >   
   >Yeah, as IF fossil fuels ARE?   
   >   
   >> Not even if fusion were made practical.   
   >> Not even if aneutronic fusion was made practical.   
   >>   
   >>>The best way to cut down our use of fossil fuels in the near-term is   
   >>>conservation.   
   >>   
   >> Staying in one place, shivering, in the dark.  No thanks.   
   >   
   >Read "Anthem".   
      
   I have, some time ago.  The most shocking thing about it was that Ayn   
   Rand could write anything short of a doorstopper.   
      
      
   --   
   The problem with socialism is there's always   
   someone with less ability and more need.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)