Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.noam-chomsky    |    Founded cognitive approach to politics    |    62,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 61,122 of 62,757    |
|    The Gnostic to All    |
|    Bradley Manning: One Soldier Who Really     |
|    01 Jan 11 12:03:46    |
      XPost: soc.veterans, alt.military.retired, alt.military       From: logos@gnosistic.com              Bradley Manning: One Soldier Who Really Did ‘Defend Our Freedom’              by Kevin Carson, January 01, 2011                     When I hear someone say that soldiers "defend our freedom," my       immediate response is to gag. I think the last time American soldiers       actually fought for the freedom of Americans was probably the       Revolutionary War — or maybe the War of 1812, if you want to be       generous. Every war since then has been for nothing but to uphold a       system of power, and to make the rich folks even richer.              But I can think of one exception. If there’s a soldier anywhere in       the world who’s fought and suffered for my freedom, it’s Pfc. Bradley       Manning.              Manning is frequently portrayed, among the knuckle-draggers on       right-wing message boards, as some sort of spoiled brat or ingrate,       acting on an adolescent whim. But that’s not quite what happened,       according to Johann Hari.              Manning, like many young soldiers, joined up in the naive belief that       he was defending the freedom of his fellow Americans. When he got to       Iraq, he found himself working under orders "to round up and hand over       Iraqi civilians to America’s new Iraqi allies, who he could see were       then torturing them with electrical drills and other implements." The       people he arrested, and handed over for torture, were guilty of such       "crimes" as writing "scholarly critiques" of the U.S. occupation       forces and its puppet government. When he expressed his moral       reservations to his supervisor, Manning "was told to shut up and get       back to herding up Iraqis."              The people Manning saw tortured, by the way, were frequently the very       same people who had been tortured by Saddam: Trade unionists, members       of the Iraqi Freedom Congress, and other freedom-loving people who had       no more use for Halliburton and Blackwater than they had for the Baath       Party.              For exposing his government’s crimes against humanity, Manning has       spent seven months in solitary confinement – a torture deliberately       calculated to break the human mind.              We see a lot of "serious thinkers" on the op-ed pages and talking head       shows, people like David Gergen, Chris Matthews, and Michael Kinsley,       going on about all the stuff that Manning’s leaks have impaired the       ability of "our government" to do.              He’s impaired the ability of the U.S. government to conduct diplomacy       in pursuit of some fabled "national interest" that I supposedly have       in common with Microsoft, Wal-Mart, and Disney. He’s risked untold       numbers of innocent lives, according to the very same people who have       ordered the deaths of untold thousands of innocent people. According       to White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, Manning’s exposure of       secret U.S. collusion with authoritarian governments in the Middle       East, to promote policies that their peoples would find abhorrent,       undermines America’s ability to promote "democracy, open government,       and free and open societies."              But I’ll tell you what Manning’s really impaired government’s ability       to do.              He’s impaired the U.S. government’s ability to lie us into wars where       thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of foreigners are       murdered.              He’s impaired its ability to use such wars – under the guise of       promoting "democracy" — to install puppet governments like the       Coalition Provisional Authority, that will rubber stamp neoliberal       "free trade" agreements (including harsh "intellectual property"       provisions written by the proprietary content industries) and cut       special deals with American crony capitalists.              He’s impaired its ability to seize good, decent people who — unlike       most soldiers — really are fighting for freedom, and hand them over       to thuggish governments for torture with power tools.              Let’s get something straight. Bradley Manning may be a criminal by the       standards of the American state. But by all human standards of       morality, the government and its functionaries that Manning exposed to       the light of day are criminals. And Manning is a hero of freedom for       doing it.              So if you’re one of the authoritarian state-worshipers, one of the       groveling sycophants of power, who are cheering on Manning’s       punishment and calling for even harsher treatment, all I can say is       that you’d probably have been there at the crucifixion urging Pontius       Pilate to lay the lashes on a little harder. You’d have told the Nazis       where Anne Frank was hiding. You’re unworthy of the freedoms which so       many heroes and martyrs throughout history — heroes like Bradley       Manning — have fought to give you.              Originally published by the Center for a Stateless Society.                     http://original.antiwar.com/kevin-carson/2010/12/31/bradley-mann       ng-one-soldier-who-really-did-defend-our-freedom/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca