XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com   
      
   On 2011-02-13, Gary L  Burnore  wrote:   
   > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Brent   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2011-02-13, Gary L  Burnore  wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:50:48 +0000 (UTC), Brent   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>So then the whole argument is refuted by itself? Owning a parking spot   
   >>>>>>is not a burden on a car owner if it appreciates at least at the rate of   
   >>>>>>inflation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Rignt now if you sold one, you'd lose money.  So no, not refuted by   
   >>>>> itself.  Also, if you consider that you're paying interest on a loan   
   >>>>> to pay that $30K, you could consider THAT a burden even if you earn it   
   >>>>> all back when it's time to sell.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>If you need a loan to buy something for $30,000, perhaps the downtown of   
   >>>>a major city is simply beyond your means.   
      
   >>> Didn't say NEED, did I?   
      
   >>it's a general 'you', so stop being moronic.   
      
   > Didn't Say _I_, fuckhead.   
   >   
   > People, in general, may or may not need a loan to pay for a $30K   
   > parking spot, some choose to, some don't.  Your inability to   
   > comprehend English makes you moronic.   
      
   If that was your statement your moronic reply was not   
   needed. Take your reading comprehension impaired ass and read what I   
   wrote initially again.  Those who can _choose_ a loan don't   
   _need_ one and aren't those I am talking about. If someone can _choose_   
   a loan then the interest cost is not relevant because they are getting   
   the loan because the interest cost is less than what having the cash   
   free or invested elsewhere is worth to them.   
      
   >>>  Of course, maybe you should ask the millions who have car loans why   
   >>> they do so.   
      
   >>When you don't have an argument, conflate it with something else.   
   >   
   > Nice try.   
      
   It's what you're doing.   
      
   >>People who can afford multi-million dollar residences in the downtowns of   
   major   
   >>cities don't need car loans either.   
      
   > What a complete and utter moron you are.  Are you actually trying to   
   > claim the only people who live in the downtowns of major cities live   
   > in multi-million dollar residences?   You ARE fucking dumb.   
      
   Wow. Talk about astounding reading comprehension and logic failure.   
   Calling me names to cover your your own stupidity. Sorry I don't have   
   the time to educate your ilk right now.   
      
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)