XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism
XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore
From: tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com
On 2011-03-14, Gary L Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:48:31 +0000 (UTC), Brent
> wrote:
>
>>On 2011-03-13, Gary L Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:23:26 +0000 (UTC), Brent
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2011-03-13, Gary L Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:33:00 +0000 (UTC), Brent
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 2011-03-12, Gary L Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:22:45 GMT, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
>>>>>>> (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>>>Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's obviously not worth it. As he drives on a public road from his
>>>>>>>>>employer who's likely getting a tax break, he'll make use of the
>>>>>>>>>bridges and lights provided by the government.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So if a person who uses any government services (even when the
>>>>>>>>government is a monopoly provider) is ineligible to be a
>>>>>>>>libertarian by reason of hypocrisy, is a person who uses any private
>>>>>>>>services (even when the government does not provide the service)
>>>>>>>>ineligible to be a socialist for the same reason?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice example of a bad analogy, frootloop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>His point is entirely valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not even close. One is unavoidable (buying services from a private
>>>>> business), the other is not.
>>>>
>>>>So why don't socialists avoid buying from private businesses to avoid
>>>>hypocrisy?
>>>>
>>> You should go ask them.
>>
>>You're the one who tried to make a hyprocrisy point, it's up to you to
>>answer.
>
> Dude, you asked a question of a group not present. Never been in a
> debate before or something? Feh.
Not only will you not defend the point of hyprocrisy that you made, you
can't read and comprehend.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
