home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.noam-chomsky      Founded cognitive approach to politics      62,757 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 61,348 of 62,757   
   Matthew Russotto to dead@gone.com   
   Re: Are weapons made in metric or standa   
   28 Mar 11 03:42:10   
   
   XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: russotto@grace.speakeasy.net   
      
   In article ,   
   5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09  wrote:   
   >On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:45:44 +0000, Matthew Russotto wrote:   
   >   
   >> In article   
   >> <18c30afd-2010-412e-923e-0b256cd6725c@s18g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nk_666?=   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>Of course U.S. weapons are designed using the metric system, since the   
   >>>math of physics is impossible without it.   
   >>   
   >> ROTFL.  Physics works just fine with feet and pounds rather than meters   
   >> and kilograms.  The math changes only by a few constant factors.   
   >   
   >Yeah, but having to convert km/sec into furlongs per fortnight does tend   
   >to increase the odds that your Mars probe may fail to adequately   
   >decelerate before encountering the planet.   
      
   All the rocket science was done (as most rocket science has been done in   
   the US since the days of Goddard) in traditional units.  The error   
   occurred when converting to metric, as required by NASA.  If the whole   
   system had been done in traditional units, there would have been no   
   issue.   
   --   
   The problem with socialism is there's always   
   someone with less ability and more need.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca