XPost: alt.autos.toyota, rec.autos.driving, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: gburnore@databasix.com   
      
   On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:47:08 -0400, Steve    
   wrote:   
      
      
   >   
   >I'm quite sure you can find people who make those claims.  I don't   
   >believe them..   
      
   Even though they have actual evidence to prove their claim.   
      
    as far as rear ender crashes are concerned, they are   
   >easily remedied when the people who do the rear-ending slow down and   
   >stop instead of planning on running the red light.   
      
   You have no idea the guy in front of you will stop short because he's   
   afraid he might get a ticket.  So a whole chain of people slam on   
   their brakes for absolutely fucking nothing and someone gets hurt.   
   Why? So you can make a buck if you're the company that installed the   
   camera.   
      
      
      
      
   >At any rate, rear enders are less destructive than red light running   
   accidents.   
      
   PROVE IT.  Betcha can't.  You state it as if it were fact.  Go on,   
   fool. Prove it.   
      
   --   
   gburnore at DataBasix dot Com   
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
                       How you look depends on where you go.   
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
   Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³   
   Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³   
                                         |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³   
   You KNOW you want one:                |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³   
   https://signup.databasix.com          |     Official Proof of Purchase   
   ===========================================================================   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)