fd568b07   
   XPost: talk.politics.libertarian, alt.anarchism, alt.society.anarchy   
   XPost: alt.activism   
   From: kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com   
      
   All this talk of root races (really subraces) is interesting, but   
   one naturally wonders -- did the root races have root races, too? I   
   suppose they did.   
      
   In the big picture -- and it's the big picture that matters most --   
   a particular type of humanity has evolved in and around Europe, and   
   we naturally build very similar cultures wherever we go. And we   
   naturally recognize each other -- and so do those who hate us.   
      
   Races are self-defining entities, whether we speak of races of   
   humans, of lower animals, or even of plants. They defined themselves   
   long before the advent of science or even reason, and continue to do   
   so. They do so on an instinctive basis that can be elaborated and   
   explained by reason and science, but is little affected by them.   
      
   I am not saying that analysis and tracing of our roots is not   
   important -- it is. But knowing whether someone is "mildly   
   Dinaricised," though it might be important in a eugenic regime of   
   the future, isn't too relevant to the immediate crisis of survival.   
   (I also question whether such things can be accurately analyzed from   
   photographs or measurements of features. There's a lot of natural   
   variation within families, to say nothing of subraces -- and   
   mutation must always be taken into account, too.)   
      
   If we are psychologically healthy, we feel a sense of kinship and   
   relatedness and caring for members of our own race, who we can   
   usually recognize in an instant. That's what's most important.   
      
      
   Kevin Alfred Strom.   
   --   
   http://nationalvanguard.org/   
   http://kevinalfredstrom.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)