3b846281   
   bf54b542   
   XPost: alt.autos.toyota, alt.fan.michael-moore   
   From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com   
      
   On Dec 14, 9:27 pm, BeamMeUpScotty   
    wrote:   
   > On 12/14/2012 9:10 PM, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > > On Dec 14, 9:05 pm, BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >> On 12/14/2012 6:55 PM, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:   
   >   
   > >>> On Dec 14, 5:11 pm, BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>  wrote:   
   > >>>> On 12/14/2012 4:48 PM, FirstPost wrote:   
   >   
   > >>>>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:23 -0800 (PST), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach   
   > >>>>> Cruiser Philosopher"  wrote:   
   >   
   > >>>>>> Who needs healthcare when we can have bombs!? We must sacrifice so our   
   > >>>>>> nations can be strong and proud.   
   >   
   > >>>> You need to be alive and free to use the health care, it would seem   
   > >>>> useless to have health care when your enemy has already killed you.   
   >   
   > >>>> That's typical of Liberals to not understand the process of prioritizing   
   > >>>> the needs of a NATION.   
   >   
   > >>> People would probably be as confused as I am about your question:   
   >   
   > >>> "Would you rather be free or enjoy healthcare?"   
   >   
   > >>> I think people would choose both but I may be wrong.   
   >   
   > >> The "or" sort of made it an either/or question and the fact is you have   
   > >> to be free to "enjoy"  your health.....   
   >   
   > >> That means the first order of business is to make sure you are alive and   
   > >> free.   After that you can prioritize things as needed but we have a   
   > >> constitution that does that for us since we chose to use it from the   
   > >> start.   
   >   
   > >> The Constitution doesn't have any priority or power to create a Federal   
   > >> health care policy or law.   Calling it a tax is an affront to the   
   > >> constitution and is tantamount to treason by anyone that calls Obama   
   > >> care constitutional, they deserve to be hung as traitors to the   
   > >> constitution.   
   >   
   > > And what do you say about the third component of the triangle?   
   > > HAPPINESS?   
   >   
   > > So the triangle is: FREEDOM, HEALTH AND HAPPINESS.   
   >   
   > > If the bike keeps me healthy and happy, how do you make space for me?   
   > > Am I free to ride a bicycle or not?   
   >   
   > As far as I am concerned you are free to ride until you hit my property.   
   >   
   > Then I have my own regulations on my property.   
   >   
   > I wouldn't want you sleazeball Liberal types suing me due to your own   
   > stupidity. I'll have to protect you from your own excessive supply of   
   > stupid.   
      
   OK, I want a traffic lane all to myself. You just go around me when   
   you find me. No honking, no roaring of the engine, no squeezing. I'm   
   ready to pay for registration or whatever it takes. The rules will be   
   different though. We'll be freer when riding a bike because we don't   
   kill people. If we kill people, it would be on the sidewalk, where   
   people ride now.   
      
   Yes, pedestrians are people too.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)