Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.noam-chomsky    |    Founded cognitive approach to politics    |    62,757 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 62,756 of 62,757    |
|    Steve Hayes to All    |
|    Noam Chomsky: A Left Response to the Rus    |
|    08 Mar 25 03:37:48    |
      [continued from previous message]              forces, which by 2013, 2014 were mostly Jihadi forces, which were       fighting against the recognized government of Syria. The government       that has a seat in the United Nations and is internationally       recognized, they were trying to overthrow it. That’s a Russian ally.       The CIA was providing advanced weapons to the opposition forces,       advanced anti-tank weapons, which did stop the Assad armies. Quite       predictably, it didn’t take a genius to predict it. I did, many other       people did. The Russians reacted.              They came into the war, really for the first time, moved in to destroy       the CIA-supplied anti-tank weapons. Then they went on to continue to       support Assad’s brutal, vicious effort to reconquer Syria, horrible       atrocities and so on. Technically it’s not criminal, certainly not       illegal, but it’s criminal in the moral sense, not in the legal sense.       Well, that’s [crosstalk] Syria. That’s what happened in Syria.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Yeah. Well, I mean, if we had more time, I’d like       to go more into Syria, in part because I think that one of the things       that you’re discounting is that there was a real uprising in Syria.              Noam Chomsky: In Syria -              Bill Fletcher Jr.: In Syria, there was a real uprising, and the US was       very ambivalent about that uprising for a while. But I wanted to get…       That could be for our next interview Noam, but for this one -              Noam Chomsky: You have to understand in Syria there was an uprising       that was part of the Arab Spring.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Right.              Noam Chomsky: A democratic reformist uprising. Assad crushed it with       extreme violence led on to the civil war -              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Correct. Yeah.              Noam Chomsky: …In which gradually the Jihadi forces pretty much took       over. You can debate the details. But by 2013, 2014, according to the       most informed observers that I know, there was a largely Jihadi based       opposition. Which the US was supporting, attempting to overthrow the       government, a brutal, murderous government, responsible for most of       the crimes, but happened to be the internationally recognized       government, which is a Russian ally. So when it got to the point that       the CIA was providing advanced weapons by 2015, not surprisingly,       predictably the Russians move in to destroy them. Then it went on to       the rest of the destruction of Syria. Is it pretty? No, it’s very       ugly. Nobody believes that the Russians are saints, but they are an       imperial power, minor in comparison with the United States. As I said       before as an economy, they’re on a par with Italy and Spain. They have       advanced weapons. We don’t have to recall that Russia was invaded,       virtually destroyed, twice in the 20th century by Germany alone.              Now the idea of an advanced, a hostile military alliance run by the       world’s most powerful and indeed most aggressive state, which is       providing in last September, enhancing its strategic and defense       cooperation with Ukraine with a robust and exercise program in keeping       with Ukraine’s status as a NATO enhanced opportunities partner,       serious threat to Russia translate [crosstalk].              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Is it really -              Noam Chomsky: …China and Mexico.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Is it really a threat? I mean, we’re talking about       2022. It’s not 1941.              Noam Chomsky: I’m talking about 2021.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Right. Okay. Right. So 2021. But is it really a       threat? I mean, there’s the likelihood of a massive land assault on       Russia is about as likely as my going to the moon tomorrow. This is       the 21st century, we’re not talking about Operation Barbarossa of       1941. And Russia has the most nuclear weapons on this planet.              I mean, one of the concerns, Noam, is that when we talk about security       and this concern for Russian security, I start wondering, well, who’s       concerned about Ukrainian security? And who’s concerned about the       security of the countries that are bordering on Russia that seem to       have been in a complete panic after the Soviet Union collapse. Where       does that fit in terms of some sort of more comprehensive approach to       security?              Noam Chomsky: Let’s take a look. There was no threat whatsoever to the       security of Austria, Finland, the Baltic countries, Germany. The West       is now euphoric about the fact that the Russian military is incapable       of capturing cities 30 kilometers from its border. There was no threat       to those countries expressed or conceivable. If you want to, there is       a threat from the United States. Why do you think world opinion       regards the United States as the most dangerous country in the world?       The world opinion, overwhelmingly, nobody else is [crosstalk]. Okay.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Right.              Noam Chomsky: There’s a reason for that. The United States does what       it wants. Invaded Iraq, destroyed the country, killed hundreds of       thousands of people, laid the basis for ethnic conflicts that are       tearing the region apart, the basis for ISIS. Remember the Nuremberg       tribunal. That’s not foreign, back in history. Invasion of       Afghanistan, not far back in history. The United States remains a       violent power.              We don’t talk about it, but in the Global South, they can see that the       United States right now, right at this moment is purposely,       consciously enhancing some of the major criminal acts in the world       right now. Right now, millions of Afghans, after 20 years of US       invasion and destruction, right now millions of Afghans are facing       literal starvation. There’s food in the markets, there are people who       have some money, but they have to watch their children starve because       they can’t go to the bank to get a little bit of money to buy food in       the market. Why? Because the United States has stolen their money.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: But Noam, see, I hear you and I’m not here.              Noam Chomsky: That’s just the very beginning.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: I understand, but I’m not here to defend the United       States, as you well know. But what I am saying is that there are       multiple imperial powers on this planet.              Noam Chomsky: Right.              Bill Fletcher Jr.: Right. And one of the things about the alleged       Russian fear of what was happening in the Ukraine is that up until       2014, Ukraine was not interested in getting into NATO. But when the       Russians intervened in the internal affairs of Ukraine, grabbing       Crimea, promoting the secessionist movements, those things changed. So       all of a sudden you have, then, a growing sympathy, which is       completely logical because the country is being torn apart.              Noam Chomsky: It’s not pretty, but it’s very logical. You’re skipping       what happened in 2014. In 2014, there was an uprising or coup, call it       what you want, which threw out the elected government, parliamentary       government, refused the offer of the president to have a referendum or       a vote and caused him to flee the country and return to the country       with direct US involvement. Do I have to repeat to you the leaked       material about Victoria Nuland? Now our point person on Ukraine       discussing secretly who we are going to work to bring to be the next       president. Should it be Yats? Should it be somebody else? Direct US       involvement to establish a government that would be pro US instead of       the former pro Russian government.              Well, Russia could have just stood by and clapped, as we could have       stood by and clapped if a pro Chinese government was established in       Mexico calling for a military alliance with China. I rather doubt that              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca