From: hineyho@hotmail.com   
      
   No shit sherlock, if you spent a bit of time looking the pics up on   
   pam message boards/fansites etc.. you would have read that they were   
   old before you wasted your money. Guess there's a sucker born every   
   minute.   
      
   On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:37:59 GMT, "Ted"   
    wrote:   
      
   >what a jip.  the so called "new" playboy pics are from the same photo shoot   
   >she did a few years ago.  you can tell by the fake tatoo drawn on her.  i   
   >made the mistake of buying it for 6 bucks, and it's not even new current   
   >pictures.  and there isnt even any full frontal nudity.   
   >   
   >this was the last playboy i'll ever buy.  they cost way too much for way too   
   >little.  a few nude pics air brushed up the wazoo, and a bunch of boring   
   >articles.  maxim, fhm, stuff, etc are way better.  sure there's no nudity,   
   >but the chicks are way hotter and less air brushed.  plus the articles are   
   >actually interesting.   
   >   
   >i'll scan the "new" pics if i get a chance, but not if i dont get a response   
   >from someone.  i'm not gonna waste my time if no one even comes here   
   >anymore.  and besides, magazine scans suck anyway.  if anyone has high   
   >quality 'official' pics, that would be nice.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)