home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.rush-limbaugh      Fans of the great one, Rush Limbaugh      278,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 276,981 of 278,939   
   -hh to Phil Da' Lick   
   Re: Americans Ready For Green New Deal   
   12 Feb 26 06:40:48   
   
   From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 2/11/26 21:51, Phil Da' Lick wrote:   
   > Socialism is for losers  wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:24:24 -0500, -hh wrote:   
   >>> ...   
   >>> But first, on your latest goalpost move attempt:  Perth's power   
   >>> sources.  Since they're not their own independent grid, WA's grid   
   >>> is the answer to that, which as has already been stated, is now   
   >>> majority renewable.   
   >>>   
   >>> BTW, you've once again avoided clearly stating how large of a   
   >>> population center meets your "never" definition .. even as the above   
   >>> goalpost drag is a tacit admission that 2M does indeed meet it.   
   >>>   
   >>> -hh   
   >>>   
   >>> [quote]   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    
   >>>   
   >>> Thanks for that cite; I've been following the Australia renewables   
   >>> topic for awhile.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> You'll find a rapid increase in renewables especially solar and   
   >>>> wind and that the nationwide mix is currently 56-44 fossil to   
   >>>> renewables with renewables on target to be the majority power   
   >>>> source before 2030.   
   >>>   
   >>> Using a 30 Day metric (closest match to the original cite), it shows   
   >>> the national average at 47.7% renewables +1.8% batteries, vs 50.5%   
   >>> fossil fuels: that's less than 1% until majority renewable - as would   
   >>> be expected with deployment of renewables increasing by more than   
   >>> 10%/yr.   
   >>>   
   >>> >> d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> For the states -hh specified, renewable percentages for the last 12   
   >>>> months are:  WA 43%, SA 68%, TAS 87% while NT is not reported.   
   >>>   
   >>> With the 30 Day metric again, WA is at 47.9% renewables +6.2%   
   >>> batteries, which puts fossil fuels at 46.8%:  majority renewable, as   
   >>> stated.   
   >>>   
   >>> >> 1d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils>   
   >>>   
   >>> Similarly, SA is 76.5% renewables +2.7% batteries (& 8.6% curtailment)   
   >>> Victoria us 52.2% renewables +1.6% batteries (& 6.4% curtailment)   
   >>> and Tazmania is 91.4% renewables.   
   >>>   
   >>> [/quote]   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>  Still nothing that shows that Western Australia primary   
   >> electric generation sources are renewables...   
      
   Except for the actual contents of the citation. Oops.   
      
   >> Nothing that shows what   
   >> Perth's primary electric generation sources are...   
      
   Except for that Perth isn't independent, but is of WA's grid. Oops.   
      
      
   >> and nothing that shows that Hughie is nothing but a sad little   
   >> creature with a long history of worthlessness.   
      
   Except that's just a pathetically lame Ad Hominem attack attempt,   
   because you know that you've lost on the facts. Oops.   
      
   > Is this the same asshole who has been spamming cola and csma for years?   
      
   Except that no one cares that you're YA butthurt luzer adding his whine.   
      
   > If so, his name is Hugh Huntzinger ...   
      
   Except that everyone knows, as I'm not hiding behind a sock;   
   gosh your mommy must be so very proud of your "detective" skills!   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca