From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:50:36 -0500, Socialism is for losers   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 06:40:48 -0500, -hh   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2/11/26 21:51, Phil Da' Lick wrote:   
   >>> Socialism is for losers  wrote:   
   >>>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:24:24 -0500, -hh wrote:   
   >>>>> ...   
   >>>>> But first, on your latest goalpost move attempt:  Perth's power   
   >>>>> sources.  Since they're not their own independent grid, WA's grid   
   >>>>> is the answer to that, which as has already been stated, is now   
   >>>>> majority renewable.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> BTW, you've once again avoided clearly stating how large of a   
   >>>>> population center meets your "never" definition .. even as the above   
   >>>>> goalpost drag is a tacit admission that 2M does indeed meet it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> -hh   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> [quote]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Thanks for that cite; I've been following the Australia renewables   
   >>>>> topic for awhile.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> You'll find a rapid increase in renewables especially solar and   
   >>>>>> wind and that the nationwide mix is currently 56-44 fossil to   
   >>>>>> renewables with renewables on target to be the majority power   
   >>>>>> source before 2030.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Using a 30 Day metric (closest match to the original cite), it shows   
   >>>>> the national average at 47.7% renewables +1.8% batteries, vs 50.5%   
   >>>>> fossil fuels: that's less than 1% until majority renewable - as would   
   >>>>> be expected with deployment of renewables increasing by more than   
   >>>>> 10%/yr.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >>>> d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> For the states -hh specified, renewable percentages for the last 12   
   >>>>>> months are:  WA 43%, SA 68%, TAS 87% while NT is not reported.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> With the 30 Day metric again, WA is at 47.9% renewables +6.2%   
   >>>>> batteries, which puts fossil fuels at 46.8%:  majority renewable, as   
   >>>>> stated.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >>>> 1d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Similarly, SA is 76.5% renewables +2.7% batteries (& 8.6% curtailment)   
   >>>>> Victoria us 52.2% renewables +1.6% batteries (& 6.4% curtailment)   
   >>>>> and Tazmania is 91.4% renewables.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> [/quote]   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Still nothing that shows that Western Australia primary   
   >>>> electric generation sources are renewables...   
   >>   
   >>Except for the actual contents of the citation. Oops.   
   >   
   >No such citation...  ooops   
   >   
   >>>> Nothing that shows what   
   >>>> Perth's primary electric generation sources are...   
   >>   
   >>Except for that Perth isn't independent, but is of WA's grid. Oops.   
   >   
   >Then, why did you bring it up.. oops   
   >   
   >>>> and nothing that shows that Hughie is nothing but a sad little   
   >>>> creature with a long history of worthlessness.   
   >>   
   >>Except that's just a pathetically lame Ad Hominem attack attempt,   
   >>because you know that you've lost on the facts. Oops.   
   >   
   >Hughie says he has posted facts, but he hasn't.   
   >   
   >>> Is this the same asshole who has been spamming cola and csma for years?   
   >>   
   >>Except that no one cares that you're YA butthurt luzer adding his whine.   
   >>   
   >>> If so, his name is Hugh Huntzinger ...   
   >>   
   >>Except that everyone knows, as I'm not hiding behind a sock;   
   >>gosh your mommy must be so very proud of your "detective" skills!   
   >   
   >I figured Hughie out a while back. He's a nebbish seeking   
   >acknowledgement because he's never accomplished anything of value.   
   >   
   >>-hh   
      
   So sad..   
      
   LAUGHTER   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)