From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com   
      
   On 2/13/26 07:05, NoBody wrote:   
   > On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:30:22 -0500, -hh wrote:   
   >> On 2/12/26 07:11, NoBody wrote:   
   >>> Of course you excluded two large portions of Australia.  Let's see the   
   >>> numbers for all of Australia so the comparison is direct and accurate.   
   >>   
   >> Because I had only noticed the news from WA.  But this goalpost move   
   >> attempt has also been addressed & you ignored reading it in this thread:   
   >> as of that cite's publication date, the continent-wide metric for   
   >> renewables vs fossil fuels were within 1% of each other.   
   >>   
   >> Now since Australia growing its renewables infrastructure by over   
   >> 10%/year, this 50/50 may by now have already changed to majority renewables.   
   >>   
   >> And even if it hasn't yet, the trend indicates that it is merely just a   
   >> matter of when, not if.   
   >>   
   >> Thus, the desperate attempts to drag the goalposts to 'Perth only', etc.   
   >   
   > LAUGHTER.   
   >   
   > Just give us the numbers for the entire nation of Australia because   
   > you haven't.   
   Nope.  Here's the cite _again_:   
      
      
      
   Today's rolling 30 day average is 50.7% FF's / 49.3% renewables, which   
   is once again within 1% of 50/50 parity as I'd previously stated.   
      
   So as I've asked you before:   
      
   "The ramifications are that if their double-digit growth in renewables   
   deployment continues through 2026 as planned, the entire continent's   
   electrical grid will be majority renewables within the next few months.   
      
   Care to bet against that?"   
      
      
   -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)