XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10n07lq$1a3vv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-02-16 14:27, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10n0045$12k09$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-02-16 12:43, pothead wrote:   
   > >>> On 2026-02-16, Two Fingered Annie  wrote:   
   > >>>> On 2/16/26 1:28 PM, Alan wrote:   
   > >>>>> On 2026-02-16 10:01, NoBody wrote:   
   > >>>>>> Looks like the Dems had better get their spin machines going as THEY   
   > >>>>>> are all over the list.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> And you actually TRUST Trump's DoJ not to have played fast and loose   
   > >>>>> with whose names they've chosen to reveal?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Be honest (for once).   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> In other words, nothing will satisfy you. Further discussion is then   
   > >>>> pointless.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> +1   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The democrats got snookered and they know it.   
   > >>> Both the Obama and Biden administrations were smart enough not to release   
   > >>> the files because they knew what was in them.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> The leftists gambled and lost so now they are calling for mommy.   
   > >> Answer my question:   
   > >>   
   > >> Do you trust that Trump's DoJ is being completely open and honest about   
   > >> what's in those files?   
   > >   
   > > Why would we trust anyone else? At least we released them.   
   >   
   > With HUGE redactions...   
   >   
   > ...after claiming they were "on her desk"...   
   >   
   > ...then claiming  they never existed.   
      
   Still released and a lot of people going down. But not   
   Trump. Sorry to disappoint you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)