XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-02-16 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10n07lq$1a3vv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2026-02-16 14:27, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10n0045$12k09$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-02-16 12:43, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-02-16, Two Fingered Annie wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/16/26 1:28 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2026-02-16 10:01, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> Looks like the Dems had better get their spin machines going as THEY
>>>>>>>> are all over the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And you actually TRUST Trump's DoJ not to have played fast and loose
>>>>>>> with whose names they've chosen to reveal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be honest (for once).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words, nothing will satisfy you. Further discussion is then
>>>>>> pointless.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> The democrats got snookered and they know it.
>>>>> Both the Obama and Biden administrations were smart enough not to release
>>>>> the files because they knew what was in them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The leftists gambled and lost so now they are calling for mommy.
>>>> Answer my question:
>>>>
>>>> Do you trust that Trump's DoJ is being completely open and honest about
>>>> what's in those files?
>>>
>>> Why would we trust anyone else? At least we released them.
>>
>> With HUGE redactions...
>>
>> ...after claiming they were "on her desk"...
>>
>> ...then claiming they never existed.
>
> Still released and a lot of people going down. But not
> Trump. Sorry to disappoint you.
But that's what we're discussing.
Since they've lied so often about this before...
...how is it you believe them now?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
