XPost: alt.global-warming, can.politics   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-02-16 20:01, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >   
   > On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 22:33:22 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >   
   >> What "defense" was necessary...   
   >   
   >>   It's a straw man because no one has ever claimed that it's even close.   
   >   
   > Nope... No strawman.   
   >   
   > You need to go and read alt.global-warming and see how many were telling us   
   > there was going to be HEAVY commercial airliners soon, hence the mocking.   
      
   YOU go and show me a single post that ever claimed it.   
      
   >   
   > Again... your replies were non-sequiturs.   
   >   
   > Even IF I accepted your "pivot", you admitted that it WAS a pivot and not on-   
   > topic. Clue: I didn't... I replied to it to MOCK you, stupid lakehouse rich   
   > boy.   
   >   
   > No "accepting" of anything.   
      
   Of course you did.   
      
   You argued the point for literally dozens of posts.   
      
   >   
   > 4 passengers and a 150 mile range gets NO ONE even CLOSE to a "Heavy All   
   > Electric AIRLINER", so, no need to even bother with addressing that TAXI   
   > service bullshit.   
      
   >   
   > LOL... 100 miles.   
      
   And there you are accepting it again.   
      
   >   
   > Again, address this, or... PLONK!   
   >   
   > "First Heavy All Electric AIRLINER Put Into Commission!"   
   >   
   > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GxvVCO0XgAAujez?format=jpg&name=medium   
   >   
   > That was the topic. THAT was what was being mocked.   
      
   Sure. That WAS the topic.   
      
   You've never proven that anyone ever said that all electric airliners   
   were anywhere CLOSE to being produced.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)